Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach

The reforms of the National Health System in the UK introduced in 1990 led to substantial changes in the organisation of primary health care. In this paper we analyse the efficiency of primary care provision in the English Family Health Service Authorities (FHSAs) over the period 1990/91–1994/95. We use Data Envelopment Analysis to measure Malmquist indices of productivity changes, which are then decomposed into indices of pure technical efficiency change, scale efficiency change and technological change. The analysis indicates a small improvement in the productivity over the period considered. The increase is attributed to pure technical efficiency improvement and positive change in scale efficiency, while the technology does not show significant change. The analysis suggests that there is very limited scope for productivity gains in this sector.

[1]  Peter Smith,et al.  Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[3]  A. Maynard.  Can competition enhance efficiency in health care? Lessons from the reform of the U.K. national health service. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[4]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[6]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[7]  Calum Paton,et al.  NHS WHITE-PAPER , 1989, The Lancet.

[8]  J. T. Pastor,et al.  A Quasi-Malmquist Productivity Index , 1998 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[10]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[11]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[12]  M. Lynch.  Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  A. Maynard.  DEVELOPING THE HEALTH CARE MARKET , 1991 .

[15]  M. Roland,et al.  Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices , 1996, BMJ.

[16]  B Leese,et al.  Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics , 1995, BMJ.

[17]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency , 1997 .

[18]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[19]  A. Hibble.  Practice nurse workload before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract for general practitioners. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[20]  M. Linna,et al.  Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models. , 1998, Health economics.

[21]  M Tambour.  The impact of health care policy initiatives on productivity. , 1997, Health economics.

[22]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[23]  Peter Smith,et al.  Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[25]  James Wallace.  Municipal Year Book , 1934 .

[26]  R. Banker.  Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[27]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[28]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment , 1996 .

[29]  D. Aigner,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 1977 .

[30]  J. M. Bates,et al.  Measuring the Efficiency of Prescribing by General Practitioners , 1996 .

[31]  A. Wall,et al.  The Reorganized National Health Service , 1976 .

[32]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  ECONOMIC DATA ISSUES , 1986 .

[33]  B Jarman,et al.  Identification of underprivileged areas , 1983, British medical journal.

[34]  C. Lenehan,et al.  Nurse practitioners in primary care: here to stay? , 1994, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[35]  M. Deverill,et al.  An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: benefits and costs. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[36]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Decomposing hospital productivity changes, 1985–1988: A nonparametric Malmquist approach , 1995 .

[37]  E Thanassoulis,et al.  The impact of the internal market on hospital efficiency, productivity and service quality , 1999, Health care management science.

[38]  J. Magnussen,et al.  Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production. , 1996, Health services research.

[39]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology , 1995 .