Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects

Single-cell proteomics capabilities have the potential to transform biomedical research and enable understanding of biological systems with a new level of granularity. Recent advances in sample processing, separations and MS instrumentation now make it possible to quantify >1000 proteins from individual mammalian cells. Graphical Abstract Highlights Label-free and isobaric labeling approaches for in-depth profiling of single cells. Miniaturization and simplification of sample processing reduce surface losses. Nanoflow separations enhance ionization efficiency and reduced chemical noise. Ultrasensitive mass spectrometry and gas-phase separation add selectivity. MS-based proteome profiling has become increasingly comprehensive and quantitative, yet a persistent shortcoming has been the relatively large samples required to achieve an in-depth measurement. Such bulk samples, typically comprising thousands of cells or more, provide a population average and obscure important cellular heterogeneity. Single-cell proteomics capabilities have the potential to transform biomedical research and enable understanding of biological systems with a new level of granularity. Recent advances in sample processing, separations and MS instrumentation now make it possible to quantify >1000 proteins from individual mammalian cells, a level of coverage that required an input of thousands of cells just a few years ago. This review discusses important factors and parameters that should be optimized across the workflow for single-cell and other low-input measurements. It also highlights recent developments that have advanced the field and opportunities for further development.

[1]  Xiangmin Zhang,et al.  Integrated Proteome Analysis Device for Fast Single-Cell Protein Profiling. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  K. Hixson,et al.  Spatially Resolved Proteome Profiling of <200 Cells from Tomato Fruit Pericarp by Integrating Laser-Capture Microdissection with Nanodroplet Sample Preparation. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Comparison of Protein Quantification in a Complex Background by DIA and TMT Workflows with Fixed Instrument Time. , 2019, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  Matthias Mann,et al.  BoxCar acquisition method enables single-shot proteomics at a depth of 10,000 proteins in 100 minutes , 2018, Nature Methods.

[5]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Enhancing bottom‐up and top‐down proteomic measurements with ion mobility separations , 2015, Proteomics.

[6]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Benchtop-compatible sample processing workflow for proteome profiling of < 100 mammalian cells , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  Sara Ballouz,et al.  Characterizing the replicability of cell types defined by single cell RNA-sequencing data using MetaNeighbor , 2018, Nature Communications.

[8]  Ryan T Kelly,et al.  The ion funnel: theory, implementations, and applications. , 2009, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[9]  Paul D Piehowski,et al.  Nanowell-mediated two-dimensional liquid chromatography enables deep proteome profiling of <1000 mammalian cells† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8sc02680g , 2018, Chemical science.

[10]  Adam T Woolley,et al.  Microfluidics: Innovations in Materials and Their Fabrication and Functionalization. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Yanyan Qu,et al.  Capillary zone electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for bottom-up proteomics , 2018, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[12]  N. Slavov,et al.  SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation , 2017, Genome Biology.

[13]  Subash Adhikari,et al.  Simple and Integrated Spintip-Based Technology Applied for Deep Proteome Profiling. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Ying Zhu,et al.  An Improved Boosting to Amplify Signal with Isobaric Labeling (iBASIL) Strategy for Precise Quantitative Single-cell Proteomics , 2020, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  M. Wilm,et al.  Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Ryan T Kelly,et al.  Subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray source and interface for improved sensitivity in mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  Liangliang Sun,et al.  Single Cell Proteomics Using Frog (Xenopus laevis) Blastomeres Isolated from Early Stage Embryos, Which Form a Geometric Progression in Protein Content. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  M. Mann,et al.  Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis , 2009, Nature Methods.

[19]  J. Coon,et al.  Proteome sequencing goes deep. , 2015, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[20]  Jörg von Hagen,et al.  Proteomics sample preparation , 2008 .

[21]  Shila Ghazanfar,et al.  The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program , 2019, Nature.

[22]  Paul D Piehowski,et al.  Subnanogram proteomics: impact of LC column selection, MS instrumentation and data analysis strategy on proteome coverage for trace samples. , 2017, International journal of mass spectrometry.

[23]  Liangliang Sun,et al.  Over 4100 protein identifications from a Xenopus laevis fertilized egg digest using reversed‐phase chromatographic prefractionation followed by capillary zone electrophoresis–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry analysis , 2016, Proteomics.

[24]  N. Slavov,et al.  SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation , 2017, Genome Biology.

[25]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Proteome Profiling of 1 to 5 Spiked Circulating Tumor Cells Isolated from Whole Blood Using Immunodensity Enrichment, Laser Capture Microdissection, Nanodroplet Sample Processing, and Ultrasensitive nanoLC-MS. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  Shashi K Murthy,et al.  An Integrated Platform for Isolation, Processing, and Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomic Profiling of Rare Cells in Whole Blood* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[27]  C. G. Edmonds,et al.  New developments in biochemical mass spectrometry: electrospray ionization. , 1990, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Ultratrace LC/MS proteomic analysis using 10-microm-i.d. Porous layer open tubular poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) capillary columns. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  Zhifang Fan,et al.  Sessile droplets for chemical and biological assays. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[30]  M. Karas,et al.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI? , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[31]  Paul D Piehowski,et al.  SNaPP: Simplified Nanoproteomics Platform for Reproducible Global Proteomic Analysis of Nanogram Protein Quantities. , 2016, Endocrinology.

[32]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[33]  S. Gygi,et al.  MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric labeling-based multiplexed quantitative proteomics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[34]  Jüergen Cox,et al.  The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[35]  Alexander Makarov,et al.  Ion traps in modern mass spectrometry. , 2019, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[36]  A. Makarov,et al.  Evolution of Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation. , 2015, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[37]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Improved Single Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  Liangliang Sun,et al.  Third-generation electrokinetically pumped sheath-flow nanospray interface with improved stability and sensitivity for automated capillary zone electrophoresis-mass spectrometry analysis of complex proteome digests. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[39]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Ultrasensitive single-cell proteomics workflow identifies >1000 protein groups per mammalian cell , 2020, bioRxiv.

[40]  Lihua Zhang,et al.  Recent Advances in Multidimensional Separation for Proteome Analysis. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells , 2018, Nature Communications.

[42]  Giuseppe Infusini,et al.  Simplified high-throughput methods for deep proteome analysis on the timsTOF Pro , 2019, bioRxiv.

[43]  Ioan Marginean,et al.  Picoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using Narrow-Bore Chemically Etched Emitters , 2013, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[44]  Min Huang,et al.  Nanoliter-Scale Oil-Air-Droplet Chip-Based Single Cell Proteomic Analysis. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[45]  Ioan Marginean,et al.  Achieving 50% ionization efficiency in subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[46]  Peter Nemes,et al.  Single‐Cell Mass Spectrometry for Discovery Proteomics: Quantifying Translational Cell Heterogeneity in the 16‐Cell Frog (Xenopus) Embryo , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[47]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Spatially Resolved Proteome Mapping of Laser Capture Microdissected Tissue with Automated Sample Transfer to Nanodroplets* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[48]  Alexander Makarov,et al.  A Compact Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer with FAIMS Interface Improves Proteome Coverage in Short LC Gradients* , 2019, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[49]  Andreas Stengel,et al.  The importance of using the optimal plasticware and glassware in studies involving peptides. , 2011, Analytical biochemistry.

[50]  David H Perlman,et al.  Single-cell mass-spectrometry quantifies the emergence of macrophage heterogeneity , 2019 .

[51]  M E Belov,et al.  Zeptomole-sensitivity electrospray ionization--Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry of proteins. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[52]  Peter Nemes,et al.  Proteomic Characterization of the Neural Ectoderm Fated Cell Clones in the Xenopus laevis Embryo by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. , 2018, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[53]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Solving the "world-to-chip" interface problem with a microfluidic matrix. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[54]  Steven Ray Wilson,et al.  Nano liquid chromatography columns. , 2019, The Analyst.

[55]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Single-cell proteomics reveals changes in expression during hair-cell development , 2019, eLife.

[56]  Ying Zhu,et al.  High-Throughput Single Cell Proteomics Enabled by Multiplex Isobaric Labelling in a Nanodroplet Sample Preparation Platform. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[57]  Ryan T. Kelly,et al.  Automated mass spectrometry imaging of over 2000 proteins from tissue sections at 100-μm spatial resolution , 2020, Nature Communications.

[58]  Liangliang Sun,et al.  Detection of 1 zmol injection of angiotensin using capillary zone electrophoresis coupled to a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer with an electrokinetically pumped sheath-flow electrospray interface. , 2019, Talanta.

[59]  Norman J. Dovichi,et al.  Miniaturized filter-aided sample preparation (MICRO-FASP) method for high throughput, ultrasensitive proteomics sample preparation reveals proteome asymmetry in Xenopus laevis embryos. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[60]  Ruilin Wu,et al.  Step-wise assessment and optimization of sample handling recovery yield for nanoproteomic analysis of 1000 mammalian cells. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[61]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  High-efficiency nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled on-line with mass spectrometry using nanoelectrospray ionization for proteomics. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[62]  Nikola Tolić,et al.  Ultrasensitive proteomics using high-efficiency on-line micro-SPE-nanoLC-nanoESI MS and MS/MS. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[63]  Christopher M Rose,et al.  Defining the carrier proteome limit for single-cell proteomics , 2020, Nature methods.

[64]  Jing Yang,et al.  Single Cell Proteomics to Study Embryonic Asymmetry in Xenopus laevis Embryos. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[65]  B. Keil,et al.  Proteolytic activity of pseudotrypsin , 1971, FEBS letters.

[66]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proteomic analyses using an accurate mass and time tag strategy. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[67]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Nanowell-mediated multidimensional separations combining nanoLC with SLIM IM-MS for rapid, high-peak-capacity proteomic analyses , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[68]  Yanyan Qu,et al.  Production of Over 27 000 Peptide and Nearly 4400 Protein Identifications by Single-Shot Capillary-Zone Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry via Combination of a Very-Low-Electroosmosis Coated Capillary, a Third-Generation Electrokinetically-Pumped Sheath-Flow Nanospray Interface, an Orbitrap Fusion Lu , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[69]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[70]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Picoflow Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Ultra-sensitive Bottom-up Proteomics using 2-µm i.d. Open Tubular Columns. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[71]  Paul D Piehowski,et al.  Nanoproteomics comes of age , 2018, Expert review of proteomics.

[72]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Automated Coupling of Nanodroplet Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics. , 2020, Analytical chemistry.

[73]  Henrik Zetterberg,et al.  Combined tissue and fluid proteomics with Tandem Mass Tags to identify low-abundance protein biomarkers of disease in peripheral body fluid: An Alzheimer's Disease case study. , 2017, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[74]  D. Clicq,et al.  Pressure-driven reverse-phase liquid chromatography separations in ordered nonporous pillar array columns. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[75]  Peter Nemes,et al.  Microsampling Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Enables Single-Cell Proteomics in Complex Tissues: Developing Cell Clones in Live Xenopus laevis and Zebrafish Embryos. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[76]  Otto Hudecz,et al.  Improved Sensitivity in Low-Input Proteomics Using Micropillar Array-Based Chromatography , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[77]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Automated Nanoflow Two-Dimensional Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography System Enables In-Depth Proteome and Phosphoproteome Profiling of Nanoscale Samples. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.