Bibliographic records in an online environment

Introduction. The IFLA functional requirements for bibliographic records model has had a major impact on cataloguing principles and practices over the past fifteen years. This paper evaluates the model in the light of changes in the wider information environment (especially to information resources and retrieval) and in information seeking behaviour online, rather than in terms of library catalogues per se. Approach. Using a critical analytic approach, it reviews a range of literature across library and information science, and analyses the implications of the changing information environment and information behaviour on usefulness of the model. Conclusion. The paper argues that although the functional requirements for bibliographic records model may be useful in terms of thinking about the bibliographic universe as constituted when the model was first developed, there have been major changes in the form, format, nature, publishing, and relationships of information resources, along with significant developments in users’ information seeking behaviour, understanding and expectations. The model may no longer be sufficient as a theoretical

[1]  Rahmatollah Fattahi From Information to Knowledge: SuperWorks and the Challenges in the Organization and Representation of the Bibliographic Universe , 2010 .

[2]  C. Rozeik Securing the Past: Conservation in Art, Architecture and Literature , 2009 .

[3]  Tamar Sadeh Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users , 2007 .

[4]  Helena Francke,et al.  What's in a Name? Contextualizing the Document Concept , 2005, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[5]  Roxanne Missingham,et al.  The Australian National Bibliographic Database and the Functional Requirements for the Bibliographic Database (FRBR) , 2005 .

[6]  Arlene G. Taylor Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools , 2007 .

[7]  Shoichi Taniguchi A conceptual model giving primacy to expression-level bibliographic entity in cataloging , 2002, J. Documentation.

[8]  Mikael Gunnarsson,et al.  From Information to Documents and Back Again , 2004 .

[9]  Richard P. Smiraglia Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review , 2012 .

[10]  Richard P. Smiraglia The Nature of 'A Work': Implications for the Organization of Knowledge , 2001 .

[11]  G. Thomas Tanselle,et al.  A Rationale of Textual Criticism , 1989 .

[12]  Barbara B. Tillett,et al.  Cataloging Theory in Search of Graph Theory and Other Ivory Towers Object: Cultural Heritage Resource Description Networks , 2011 .

[13]  William Denton,et al.  FRBR and the History of Cataloging , 2007 .

[14]  Shoichi Taniguchi Conceptual modeling of component parts of bibliographic resources in cataloging , 2003, J. Documentation.

[15]  Patrick Le Boeuf FRBR: Hype or Cure-All? Introduction , 2005 .

[16]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  "I still like Google": University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web , 2005, ASIST.

[17]  N. Carr The Shallows: How the Internet Is Changing the Way We Think, Read and Remember , 2010 .

[18]  Marie-Louise Ayres Case Studies in implementing Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [FRBR]: AustLit and MusicAustralia , 2005 .

[19]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs still hard to use , 1996 .

[20]  David Bade,et al.  IT, That Obscure Object of Desire: On French Anthropology, Museum Visitors, Airplane Cockpits, RDA, and the Next Generation Catalog , 2012 .

[21]  K. Fisher,et al.  Theories of information behavior , 2005 .

[22]  D. McDowell Foreword , 1999 .

[23]  Brian Lavoie,et al.  The concept of a work in WorldCat: an application of FRBR , 2003 .

[24]  This Is Not the End of the Book: A Conversation by Jean-Claude Carrière and Umberto Eco (review) , 2014 .

[25]  Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan,et al.  The French conception of information science: "Une exception française"? , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Intuitiveness of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: a study in a broader context , 2010, Inf. Res..

[27]  Dennis Nicholson The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2003 .

[28]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Mental models of the bibliographic universe. Part 1: mental models of descriptions , 2010, J. Documentation.

[29]  Karen S Calhoun,et al.  Online catalogs : what users and librarians want , 2009 .

[30]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Mental models: a theoretical overview and preliminary study , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Mental models of the bibliographic universe. Part 2: comparison task and conclusions , 2010, J. Documentation.

[32]  Mauro Guerrini,et al.  From Bibliographic Models to Cataloging Rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the Relationships Between Them , 2009 .

[33]  Alberto Petrucciani From the FRBR Model to the Italian Cataloging Code (and Vice Versa?) , 2012 .

[34]  Carlo Revelli The catalogue (and the cataloguer): a defenseless entity? , 2012 .

[35]  Maja Zumer,et al.  User verification of the FRBR conceptual model , 2012, J. Documentation.

[36]  P. Wilson Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[37]  Athena Salaba,et al.  What Is Next for Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records? A Delphi Study1 , 2009, The Library Quarterly.

[38]  Athena Salaba,et al.  Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Critical issues and challenges facing FRBR research and practice , 2008 .

[39]  Allyson Carlyle,et al.  Understanding FRBR as a Conceptual Model: FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe , 2006 .

[40]  Marcia Kay Salmon Implementing FRBR in Libraries: Key Issues and Future Directions , 2013 .

[41]  Barbara Tillett,et al.  What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe , 2005 .

[42]  Athena Salaba,et al.  What Do Users Tell Us about FRBR-Based Catalogs? , 2012 .

[43]  Maja Zumer,et al.  New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues , 2008, Program.

[44]  Olivia M. A. Madison The Origins of the IFLA Study on Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records , 2005 .