Effective learning is accompanied by increasingly efficient dimensionality of whole-brain responses

Theories and tools to measure the efficiency of neural codes have been important in understanding neural responses to external stimuli. However, similar principles to describe the efficiency of brain responses to tasks demanding higher-order cognitive processes remain underdeveloped. A key domain to study such efficiency is learning, where patterns of activity across the entire brain provide insight into the principles governing the acquisition of knowledge about objects or concepts. We propose a mathematical framework for studying the efficiency of spatially embedded whole-brain states reflected in functional MRI, and demonstrate its utility in describing how human subjects learn the values of novel objects. We find that compared to slow learners, quick learners use a smaller ambient embedding to simultaneously encode higher dimensional patterns of neural responses to stimuli, providing a notion of effective coding most associated with rapid learning. Furthermore, we identify which regions form the strongest neurophysiological drivers of these differences in learning rate, and complement our region-based approach with a voxel-level approach to uncover structure in finer-scale responses. Finally, for a full investigation of complementary geometric approaches, we verify that quick learners develop more assortative responses to stimuli: that is, whole-brain responses that are more easily distinguishable from one another. Our work offers a suite of geometric measures to represent a notion of efficient coding for higher-order cognitive processes, and provide insight into the dimensionality of neural responses characteristic of the successful optimization of reward, that are applicable to the study of cognitive performance more broadly.

[1]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Thorsten Kahnt,et al.  A decade of decoding reward-related fMRI signals and where we go from here , 2017, NeuroImage.

[3]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Biased Associative Representations in Parietal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[8]  Brendon O. Watson,et al.  Brain rhythms and neural syntax: implications for efficient coding of cognitive content and neuropsychiatric disease. , 2012, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[9]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[11]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Conceptual Object Representations in Human Anterior Temporal Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  L. Cammoun,et al.  The Connectome Mapper: An Open-Source Processing Pipeline to Map Connectomes with MRI , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Wilma Koutstaal,et al.  Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Dost Öngür,et al.  Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[21]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Functional connectivity with anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices during decision-making. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[27]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[28]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  R. Poldrack Is “efficiency” a useful concept in cognitive neuroscience? , 2014, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[32]  K. Miller,et al.  One-Dimensional Dynamics of Attention and Decision Making in LIP , 2008, Neuron.

[33]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Trouble at Rest: How Correlation Patterns and Group Differences Become Distorted After Global Signal Regression , 2012, Brain Connect..

[34]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages , 2012 .

[35]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[36]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning , 1992 .

[38]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The network architecture of value learning , 2016, Network Neuroscience.

[39]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Fine-Scale Spatial Organization of Face and Object Selectivity in the Temporal Lobe: Do Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Optical Imaging, and Electrophysiology Agree? , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.