Comparison of Self-Questioning, Summarizing, and Notetaking-Review as Strategies for Learning From Lectures

Underprepared college students in three conditions viewed a lecture, took notes, and then engaged in their respective study strategies. Those trained in questioning generated (and answered) their own questions based on the lecture, those trained in summarizing wrote original summaries of the lecture, and those in an untrained control group simply reviewed their lecture notes. At immediate testing, summarizers recalled more of the lecture content than did self-questioners, who in turn outperformed notetaking-reviewers. On a retention test of lecture content one week later, the self-questioners performed somewhat better than the summarizers and significantly better than the notetaking-reviewers. Self questioners’ and summarizers’ lecture notes contained more ideas from the lecture than did those of the notetaking-review students. Use of these generative study strategies appears to enhance learning from lectures by improving encoding both during the lecture and following the lecture; and for long-term retention of lecture material, self-questioning may be a more effective study strategy than summarizing.

[1]  Sidney Pressey to receive first E. L. Thorndike award , 1963 .

[2]  James Hartley,et al.  SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFICIENCY OF LECTURING , 1967 .

[3]  Michael J. A. Howe,et al.  Using Students' Notes to Examine the Role of the Individual Learner in Acquiring Meaningful Subject Matter , 1970 .

[4]  F. di Vesta,et al.  Listening and note taking. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[5]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[6]  Francis J. Di Vesta,et al.  Listening and Note Taking: II. Immediate and Delayed Recall as Functions of Variations in Thematic Continuity, Note Taking, and Length of Listening-Review Intervals. , 1973 .

[7]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[8]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material. , 1976 .

[9]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Oral Summary as a Review Strategy for Enhancing Recall of Textual Material. , 1976 .

[10]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[13]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  Generative processes in reading comprehension. , 1978 .

[14]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming , 1981, CSUR.

[15]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Note-Taking and Passage Style. , 1981 .

[16]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. , 1982 .

[17]  Ann L. Brown.  Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise , 1983 .

[19]  R. Mayer.  Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .

[20]  M. Pressley,et al.  Memory strategy instruction is made of this: Metamemory and durable strategy use. , 1984 .

[21]  M. Simpson.  The Status of Study Strategy Instruction: Implications for Classroom Teachers. , 1984 .

[22]  The relationship between levels of note-taking and achievement. , 1984 .

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[24]  B. Wong,et al.  Self-Questioning Instructional Research: A Review , 1985 .

[25]  Steven D. Rinehart.  Some Effects of Summarization Training on Reading and Studying. , 1986 .

[26]  B. Davey,et al.  Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension , 1986 .

[27]  J. Campione,et al.  Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. , 1985, The American psychologist.

[28]  W. D. Rohwer,et al.  Academic Studying: The Role of Learning Strategies , 1986 .

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  Generative Effects of Note-Taking during Science Lectures. , 1986 .

[30]  Valerie Anderson,et al.  Producing Written Summaries: Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction , 1986 .

[31]  Rosalind Horowitz,et al.  Comprehending Oral and Written Language. , 1987 .

[32]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategy-comparison opportunities promote long-term strategy use☆ , 1988 .

[33]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Acquisition of Confusing Facts. , 1988 .

[34]  H. Walberg,et al.  Can Comprehension Be Taught? , 1988 .

[35]  L. Baker.  Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader , 1989 .

[36]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  The Constructivist Approach to Self-Regulation and Learning in the Classroom , 1989 .

[37]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[38]  Kenneth A. Kiewra.  A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond , 1989 .

[39]  R. J. Hall,et al.  Cognitive-behavioral psychology in the schools : a comprehensive handbook , 1989 .

[40]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. , 1989 .

[41]  A. King.  Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures , 1989 .

[42]  Kathryn Alesandrini,et al.  Generation of Summaries and Analogies and Analytic and Holistic Abilities , 1990 .

[43]  A. King.  Enhancing Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal Questioning , 1990 .

[44]  A. King.  Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy , 1991 .

[45]  A. King.  Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning , 1992 .

[46]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Learning from Lectures: Effects of Cooperative Review , 1993 .

[47]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.