A Technique for Classifying Uncertain MOD35/MYD35 Pixels Through Meteosat Second Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager Observations

This paper describes a technique that uses the information gathered from the geostationary instrumentation [Meteosat Second Generation (MSG)-Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI)] to investigate the pixels detected as ¿uncertain¿ by the operational Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud-mask algorithm. This technique analyzes the uncertain MODIS areas by using a time series of MSG-SEVIRI images taken at infrared (IR) and visible (VIS) wavelengths. In order to classify the uncertain pixels related to the granules acquired during the daytime and completely included in the high-resolution visible (HRV) image, the spectral and textural features derived from a time series of HRV images are used as inputs in a K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) classifier. For the areas not included in the HRV image and for those acquired during nighttime, the input parameters are determined from a time series of IR/VIS and IR images, respectively. The K-NN classifier detected 52.0%, 48.7%, and 37.0% of the MOD35/MYD35 uncertain pixels analyzed over land and 54.5%, 45.4%, and 49.7% of those analyzed over sea as cloud free, when using HRV, IR, and IR/VIS features as inputs, respectively. Percentages of 39.8%, 31.8%, and 37.3% of the pixels analyzed over land and 40.7%, 47.4%, and 38.0% of those analyzed over sea were classified as cloudy when using HRV, IR, and IR/VIS features as inputs, respectively. The remaining uncertain pixels were classified as low confidence cloudy or cloud free by the K-NN classifier. A set of comparisons was made with cloud-profiling radar/cloud-aerosol lidar with orthogonal polarization 2B-Geometrical Profiling-Lidar product results.

[1]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  High-Spatial-Resolution Surface and Cloud-Type Classification from MODIS Multispectral Band Measurements , 2003 .

[2]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[3]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[4]  R. Marchand,et al.  Hydrometeor Detection Using Cloudsat—An Earth-Orbiting 94-GHz Cloud Radar , 2008 .

[5]  J. Schmetz,et al.  Technical note: Quantitative monitoring of a Saharan dust event with SEVIRI on Meteosat‐8 , 2007 .

[6]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation , 2008 .

[7]  Richard A. Frey,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part I: Improvements in the MODIS Cloud Mask for Collection 5 , 2008 .

[8]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Nighttime polar cloud detection with MODIS , 2004 .

[9]  S. Ackerman Remote sensing aerosols using satellite infrared observations , 1997 .

[10]  W. Menzel,et al.  Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS , 1998 .

[11]  Joann Parikh,et al.  A comparative study of cloud classification techniques , 1977 .

[12]  Chialin Wu,et al.  Cloud profiling radar for the CloudSat mission , 2005, IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005..

[13]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[14]  Alain Chedin,et al.  Dust altitude and infrared optical depth from AIRS , 2004 .

[15]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[16]  Filomena Romano,et al.  Physical and statistical approaches for cloud identification using Meteosat Second Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager Data , 2008 .