Lose it to Gain it! Unlearning by Individuals and Relearning as a Team

The chapter explores team learning from a problem-oriented knowledge utilization perspective. Based on a framework of knowledge sharing and experimentation implemented in a large multinational organization in Saudi Arabia, this chapter offers several managerial implications for implementing learning-oriented change processes in teams. Through a qualitative case design, the in-depth study led to several important findings. First, knowledge sharing as a “holding” space—or “pause and think”—encourages individuals to engage in meaningful dialogue, and in constructive and reflective inquiry into complex work challenges. Second, “wicked” problems, as the focus of knowledge coproduction, serve as boundary “objects” that facilitate deeper inquiry into contexts and paradigms, promoting self-transcendence. Third, both negative and positive feedback could trigger unlearning at the team level in different ways, influencing the extent to which team members externalize and internalize knowledge. Through unlearning and relearning, tacit and explicit knowledge interact to produce path-creating ideas and action strategies as team members engage in sensemaking and experimentation—or “test and act.”

[1]  Michael J. Marquardt,et al.  To share or not to share? Self-perception and knowledge-sharing intent , 2015 .

[2]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking shared organisational context and relational capital through unlearning: An initial empirical investigation in SMEs , 2006 .

[3]  G. Lynn,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Unlearning in New Product Development Teams , 2006 .

[4]  A. Edmondson,et al.  6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process , 2007 .

[5]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity , 2003 .

[6]  M. Alvesson Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Image and Identity , 2001 .

[7]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products , 1998 .

[8]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Focusing on Midpoint Transitions: An Analysis of Boundary Conditions , 2002 .

[9]  Gerardo Patriotta Sensemaking on the Shop Floor: Narratives of Knowledge in Organizations* , 2003 .

[10]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Team Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures , 2014 .

[11]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[12]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[13]  Gareth Edwards,et al.  Managing the monsters of doubt: Liminality, threshold concepts and leadership learning , 2015 .

[14]  A. Brooks Power and the Production of Knowledge: Collective Team Learning in Work Organizations. , 1994 .

[15]  Bengt Gustavsson,et al.  Towards a transcendent epistemology of organizations: New foundations for organizational change , 2001 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[17]  Crispin R. Coombs,et al.  The process of individual unlearning: A neglected topic in an under-researched field , 2014 .

[18]  K. Grint Wicked Problems and Clumsy Solutions: The Role of Leadership , 2010 .

[19]  Isabel Rimanoczy,et al.  Action Reflection Learning: Solving Real Business Problems by Connecting Learning with Earning , 2008 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[21]  Dennis McGrath,et al.  Organizational Cultures as Holding Environments: A Psychodynamic Look at Organizational Symbolism , 1999 .

[22]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[23]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[25]  D. Winnicott Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena 1951 , 1951 .

[26]  Cheryl Brook,et al.  On stopping doing those things that are not getting us to where we want to be: Unlearning, wicked problems and critical action learning , 2016 .

[27]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[28]  Martin Barrett,et al.  Team-Based Knowledge Sharing: Learning Through Complex Work Challenges , 2016 .

[29]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .

[30]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Design Matters for Management , 2010 .

[31]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  Organizational unlearning and organizational relearning: a dynamic process of knowledge management , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  Mike Pedler,et al.  Unlearning, critical action learning and wicked problems , 2014 .

[33]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Looking Inside the Dream Team: Probing Into the Contributions of Tacit Knowledge as an Organizational Resource , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[35]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams , 2002 .

[36]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[39]  Kiran Trehan,et al.  Action learning, organisational research and the ‘wicked’ problems , 2008 .

[40]  B. Hedberg How Organizations Learn and Unlearn , 1981 .

[41]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Complexity Leadership in Bureaucratic Forms of Organizing: A Meso Model , 2009 .

[42]  Karen L. Becker,et al.  Facilitating unlearning during implementation of new technology , 2010 .

[43]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[44]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[45]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning , 2013 .

[46]  R. Snell,et al.  Programmed, Autonomous-Formal and Spontaneous Organizational Learning , 2003 .

[47]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[48]  Howard M. Weiss,et al.  Learning theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[49]  P. Nystrom,et al.  To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn , 1984 .

[50]  Gianpiero Petriglieri,et al.  Identity Workspaces: The Case of Business Schools , 2010 .

[51]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners , 2010, Organ. Sci..