Developing hydrophobic and superhydrophobic TiO2 coatings by plasma spraying

Abstract In this work, atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) and suspension plasma spraying (SPS) are employed for developing micro/nano morphologies of superhydrophobic coatings with high water repellence and mobility. Accordingly, multiple coatings were developed with different surface morphologies, then by isolating the effect of surface chemistry using a stearic acid treatment, the importance and influence of the achieved morphologies on wetting behavior of the coatings were investigated. Experimental results show that, although coatings developed by the APS process may reach water contact angles as high as 145°, the water mobility of these coatings is low due to relatively large morphological features resulting from the micron-sized feedstock powder. On the other hand, coatings developed by SPS show superior water repellence (manifested through water contact angles as high as 167°) as well as improved mobility (displayed through water sliding angles as small as 1.3°) due to dual-scale submicron/nano (hierarchical) roughness attributed to the submicron size particles in the feedstock. The dynamic behavior of an impinging water droplet is studied and compared to other existing natural and fabricated superhydrophobic surfaces.

[1]  A. Fujishima,et al.  Effects of the Surface Roughness on Sliding Angles of Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Surfaces , 2000 .

[2]  Do Yeon Kim,et al.  Self-cleaning superhydrophobic films by supersonic-spraying polytetrafluoroethylene–titania nanoparticles , 2015 .

[3]  Robert Vaßen,et al.  Advanced thermal spray technologies for applications in energy systems , 2008 .

[4]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[5]  Min Woo Kim,et al.  A highly transparent self-cleaning superhydrophobic surface by organosilane-coated alumina particles deposited via electrospraying , 2015 .

[6]  P. Choquet,et al.  A simple and scalable approach towards the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces – importance of the surface roughness skewness , 2014 .

[7]  A. Fujishima,et al.  A mechanically bendable superhydrophobic steel surface with self-cleaning and corrosion-resistant properties , 2015 .

[8]  B N J Persson,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[9]  T. Vuorinen,et al.  Analysis of roughness parameters to specify superhydrophobic antireflective boehmite films made by the sol–gel process , 2008 .

[10]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis. III. Study of an Idealized Heterogeneous Surface , 1964 .

[11]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces , 2006 .

[12]  Akira Fujishima,et al.  Superhydrophobic Surfaces Developed by Mimicking Hierarchical Surface Morphology of Lotus Leaf , 2014, Molecules.

[13]  M. Gentleman,et al.  Role of hydroxyls in oxide wettability. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[14]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Recent developments in bio-inspired special wettability. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[15]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[16]  Zhiyong Xiao,et al.  A comparative study of droplet impact dynamics on a dual-scaled superhydrophobic surface and lotus leaf , 2011 .

[17]  Patrik Hoffmann,et al.  A Snake-Based Approach to Accurate Determination of Both Contact Points and Contact Angles , 2006 .

[18]  David Reinhoudt,et al.  What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[19]  Bao-Lian Su,et al.  Superhydrophobic surfaces: from natural to biomimetic to functional. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[20]  Wei Chen,et al.  Ultrahydrophobic and Ultralyophobic Surfaces: Some Comments and Examples , 1999 .

[21]  J. Rühe,et al.  Some thoughts on superhydrophobic wetting , 2009 .

[22]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Definition of Superhydrophobic States , 2007 .

[23]  M. Unser,et al.  ow-bond axisymmetric drop shape analysis for surface tension and contact ngle measurements of sessile drops , 2010 .

[24]  Steven L. Ceccio,et al.  Skin-friction drag reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces , 2014 .

[25]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction , 2011 .

[26]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Wettability of Atmospheric Plasma Sprayed Fe, Ni, Cr and Their Mixture Coatings , 2012, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology.

[27]  T. Young.  III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids , 1805, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[28]  R. N. Wenzel.  RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[29]  Hongzheng Chen,et al.  Superhydrophobic cotton fabrics prepared by sol–gel coating of TiO2 and surface hydrophobization , 2008, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[30]  Do Yeon Kim,et al.  Superhydrophobic surface decorated with vertical ZnO nanorods modified by stearic acid , 2014 .