Quantitative description of the asymmetry in magnetization transfer effects around the water resonance in the human brain

Magnetization transfer (MT) imaging provides a unique method of tissue characterization by capitalizing on the interaction between solid‐like tissue components and bulk water. We used a continuous‐wave (CW) MT pulse sequence with low irradiation power to study healthy human brains in vivo at 3 T and quantified the asymmetry of the MT effects with respect to the water proton frequency. This asymmetry was found to be a difference of approximately a few percent from the water signal intensity, depending on both the RF irradiation power and the frequency offset. The experimental results could be quantitatively described by a modified two‐pool MT model extended with a shift contribution for the semisolid pool with respect to water. For white matter, this shift was fitted to be 2.34 ± 0.17 ppm (N = 5) upfield from the water signal. Magn Reson Med 58:786–793, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  R. Balaban,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Chai,et al.  Estimation of in vivo proton intrinsic and cross‐relaxation rates in human brain , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  D. S. Williams,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Robert S. Balaban,et al.  NMR imaging of labile proton exchange , 1990 .

[8]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Off‐resonance metabolite magnetization transfer measurements on rat brain in situ , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  S. Singer,et al.  High‐resolution MAS NMR spectroscopy detection of the spin magnetization exchange by cross‐relaxation and chemical exchange in intact cell lines and human tissue specimens , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R S Balaban,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[12]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  Pulsed magnetization transfer imaging with body coil transmission at 3 Tesla: Feasibility and application , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Enzo Terreno,et al.  Paramagnetic Lanthanide(III) complexes as pH‐sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents for MRI applications , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Mechanism of magnetization transfer during on‐resonance water saturation. A new approach to detect mobile proteins, peptides, and lipids , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[18]  R. Bryant,et al.  The dynamics of water-protein interactions. , 1996, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[19]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Modeling magnetization transfer for biological-like systems using a semi-solid pool with a super-Lorentzian lineshape and dipolar reservoir. , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[20]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and spectroscopy , 2006 .

[21]  R S Balaban,et al.  A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[22]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  R S Balaban,et al.  Detection of proton chemical exchange between metabolites and water in biological tissues. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  V. Dousset,et al.  Magnetization transfer imaging in vivo of the rat brain at 4.7 T: Interpretation using a binary spin‐bath model with a superlorentzian lineshape , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  G. Barker,et al.  Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  G J Barker,et al.  Quantitative magnetization transfer mapping of bound protons in multiple sclerosis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  J A Frank,et al.  Perfusion imaging with compensation for asymmetric magnetization transfer effects , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  C. Morrison,et al.  A Model for Magnetization Transfer in Tissues , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  A. Sherry,et al.  A novel europium(III)-based MRI contrast agent. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  G. Pike,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer in spoiled gradient echo MRI sequences. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.