The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution

BackgroundMajor transitions in biological evolution show the same pattern of sudden emergence of diverse forms at a new level of complexity. The relationships between major groups within an emergent new class of biological entities are hard to decipher and do not seem to fit the tree pattern that, following Darwin's original proposal, remains the dominant description of biological evolution. The cases in point include the origin of complex RNA molecules and protein folds; major groups of viruses; archaea and bacteria, and the principal lineages within each of these prokaryotic domains; eukaryotic supergroups; and animal phyla. In each of these pivotal nexuses in life's history, the principal "types" seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features of the respective new level of biological organization. No intermediate "grades" or intermediate forms between different types are detectable. Usually, this pattern is attributed to cladogenesis compressed in time, combined with the inevitable erosion of the phylogenetic signal.HypothesisI propose that most or all major evolutionary transitions that show the "explosive" pattern of emergence of new types of biological entities correspond to a boundary between two qualitatively distinct evolutionary phases. The first, inflationary phase is characterized by extremely rapid evolution driven by various processes of genetic information exchange, such as horizontal gene transfer, recombination, fusion, fission, and spread of mobile elements. These processes give rise to a vast diversity of forms from which the main classes of entities at the new level of complexity emerge independently, through a sampling process. In the second phase, evolution dramatically slows down, the respective process of genetic information exchange tapers off, and multiple lineages of the new type of entities emerge, each of them evolving in a tree-like fashion from that point on. This biphasic model of evolution incorporates the previously developed concepts of the emergence of protein folds by recombination of small structural units and origin of viruses and cells from a pre-cellular compartmentalized pool of recombining genetic elements. The model is extended to encompass other major transitions. It is proposed that bacterial and archaeal phyla emerged independently from two distinct populations of primordial cells that, originally, possessed leaky membranes, which made the cells prone to rampant gene exchange; and that the eukaryotic supergroups emerged through distinct, secondary endosymbiotic events (as opposed to the primary, mitochondrial endosymbiosis). This biphasic model of evolution is substantially analogous to the scenario of the origin of universes in the eternal inflation version of modern cosmology. Under this model, universes like ours emerge in the infinite multiverse when the eternal process of exponential expansion, known as inflation, ceases in a particular region as a result of false vacuum decay, a first order phase transition process. The result is the nucleation of a new universe, which is traditionally denoted Big Bang, although this scenario is radically different from the Big Bang of the traditional model of an expanding universe. Hence I denote the phase transitions at the end of each inflationary epoch in the history of life Biological Big Bangs (BBB).ConclusionA Biological Big Bang (BBB) model is proposed for the major transitions in life's evolution. According to this model, each transition is a BBB such that new classes of biological entities emerge at the end of a rapid phase of evolution (inflation) that is characterized by extensive exchange of genetic information which takes distinct forms for different BBBs. The major types of new forms emerge independently, via a sampling process, from the pool of recombining entities of the preceding generation. This process is envisaged as being qualitatively different from tree-pattern cladogenesis.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by William Martin, Sergei Maslov, and Leonid Mirny.

[1]  Ernst Haeckel Generelle Morphologie der Organismen , 1866 .

[2]  G. Gamow,et al.  Expanding universe and the origin of elements , 1946 .

[3]  C. Darwin On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[4]  S. Coleman The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory , 1977 .

[5]  S. Weinberg The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe , 1988 .

[6]  Alan H. Guth,et al.  Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe , 1980 .

[7]  L. Margulis Symbiosis in cell evolution: Life and its environment on the early earth , 1981 .

[8]  A. Guth Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems , 1981 .

[9]  Andrei Linde,et al.  A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon , 1982 .

[10]  A. Guth,et al.  Could the Universe Have Recovered from a Slow First Order Phase Transition , 1983 .

[11]  Alexander Vilenkin,et al.  Birth of inflationary universes , 1983 .

[12]  L Margulis,et al.  Symbiosis as a mechanism of evolution: status of cell symbiosis theory. , 1985, Symbiosis.

[13]  Andrei Linde Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflanationary universe , 1986 .

[14]  J E Darnell,et al.  Speculations on the early course of evolution. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Andrei Linde Eternally Existing Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe , 1987 .

[16]  L Margulis,et al.  Symbiont acquisition as neoseme: origin of species and higher taxa. , 1987, Symbiosis.

[17]  D. D. Des Marais Microbial mats and the early evolution of life. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  D. D. Marais Microbial mats and the early evolution of life , 1990 .

[19]  N. Eldredge,et al.  Punctuated equilibrium comes of age , 1993, Nature.

[20]  E. Koonin,et al.  Evolution and taxonomy of positive-strand RNA viruses: implications of comparative analysis of amino acid sequences. , 1993, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[21]  S. Gould,et al.  Tempo and mode in the macroevolutionary reconstruction of Darwinism. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  F J Ayala,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[24]  E. Davidson,et al.  Origin of Bilaterian Body Plans: Evolution of Developmental Regulatory Mechanisms , 1995, Science.

[25]  Jeffrey S. Levinton,et al.  Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences Among Metazoan Phyla , 1996, Science.

[26]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[27]  M. Rees Anthropic Reasoning , 1997, Science.

[28]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Comparison of archaeal and bacterial genomes: computer analysis of protein sequences predicts novel functions and suggests a chimeric origin for the archaea , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Archaea and the Origin(s) of DNA Replication Proteins , 1997, Cell.

[30]  K. Jagannathan,et al.  The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. , 1997 .

[31]  Niles Eldredge,et al.  Punctuated equilibria , 1997, Scholarpedia.

[32]  W. Martin,et al.  The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote , 1998, Nature.

[33]  E V Koonin,et al.  Evidence for massive gene exchange between archaeal and bacterial hyperthermophiles. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[34]  C DeLisi,et al.  Estimating the number of protein folds. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  C. Woese The universal ancestor. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  W. Doolittle You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[37]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and Bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima , 1999, Nature.

[38]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Lateral genomics. , 1999, Trends in cell biology.

[39]  E. Pennisi Is It Time to Uproot the Tree of Life? , 1999, Science.

[40]  R. Knight,et al.  Vertebrate genome evolution: a slow shuffle or a big bang? , 1999, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[41]  Doolittle Wf Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree , 1999 .

[42]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Did DNA replication evolve twice independently? , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  T. Cavalier-smith Principles of Protein and Lipid Targeting in Secondary Symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, Dinoflagellate, and Sporozoan Plastid Origins and the Eukaryote Family Tree 1 , 2 , 1999, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[44]  L. Orgel,et al.  Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree , 1999 .

[45]  Charles F. Delwiche,et al.  Tracing the Thread of Plastid Diversity through the Tapestry of Life , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[46]  H. Philippe,et al.  The new phylogeny of eukaryotes. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[47]  E V Koonin,et al.  Estimating the number of protein folds and families from complete genome data. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  E. Koonin,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Genomics on Our Understanding of Evolution , 2000, Cell.

[49]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Uprooting the tree of life. , 2000, Scientific American.

[50]  H. Ochman,et al.  Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation , 2000, Nature.

[51]  R. Fortey Evolution. The Cambrian explosion exploded? , 2001, Science.

[52]  N. Grishin,et al.  Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades , 2001, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[53]  E. Koonin,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: quantification and classification. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[54]  N. Grishin Fold change in evolution of protein structures. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[55]  E. Koonin,et al.  Common Origin of Four Diverse Families of Large Eukaryotic DNA Viruses , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[56]  R. Fortey The Cambrian Explosion Exploded? , 2001, Science.

[57]  C. Ponting,et al.  On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[58]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  C. Woese On the evolution of cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  T. Cavalier-smith The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. , 2002, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[61]  R. Kerr A Trigger for the Cambrian Explosion? , 2002, Science.

[62]  E. Koonin,et al.  Trends in protein evolution inferred from sequence and structure analysis. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[63]  R. Kerr Evolution. A trigger for the Cambrian explosion? , 2002, Science.

[64]  John Moult,et al.  A unifold, mesofold, and superfold model of protein fold use , 2002, Proteins.

[65]  N. Grishin,et al.  Genome trees and the tree of life. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[66]  D. D. Des Marais Biogeochemistry of Hypersaline Microbial Mats Illustrates the Dynamics of Modern Microbial Ecosystems and the Early Evolution of the Biosphere , 2003, The Biological Bulletin.

[67]  D. Bartel,et al.  Processivity of ribozyme-catalyzed RNA polymerization. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[68]  T. Cavalier-smith Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae). , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[69]  S. Baldauf,et al.  The Deep Roots of Eukaryotes , 2003, Science.

[70]  Simon Conway-Morris,et al.  The Cambrian "explosion" of metazoans and molecular biology: would Darwin be satisfied? , 2003, The International journal of developmental biology.

[71]  Céline Brochier,et al.  Archaeal phylogeny based on proteins of the transcription and translation machineries: tackling the Methanopyrus kandleri paradox , 2004, Genome Biology.

[72]  W. Martin,et al.  On the origins of cells: a hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[73]  L. Susskind The Anthropic Landscape of String Theory , 2003, hep-th/0302219.

[74]  R. Bousso,et al.  The string theory landscape. , 2004, Scientific American.

[75]  Mikhail S. Gelfand,et al.  Genome-Wide Molecular Clock and Horizontal Gene Transfer in Bacterial Evolution , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[76]  David Goldberg,et al.  Automatic selection of representative proteins for bacterial phylogeny , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[77]  Purificación López-García,et al.  Ancestral lipid biosynthesis and early membrane evolution. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[78]  G. McFadden,et al.  Evolution: Red Algal Genome Affirms a Common Origin of All Plastids , 2004, Current Biology.

[79]  E. Koonin,et al.  Evolution of bacterial RNA polymerase: implications for large-scale bacterial phylogeny, domain accretion, and horizontal gene transfer. , 2004, Gene.

[80]  P. Keeling,et al.  Diversity and evolutionary history of plastids and their hosts. , 2004, American journal of botany.

[81]  Debashish Bhattacharya,et al.  Photosynthetic eukaryotes unite: endosymbiosis connects the dots. , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[82]  D. Kaiser,et al.  Inflationary Cosmology: Exploring the Universe from the Smallest to the Largest Scales , 2005, Science.

[83]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  On the origin of genomes and cells within inorganic compartments , 2005, Trends in Genetics.

[84]  Vincent Daubin,et al.  Examining bacterial species under the specter of gene transfer and exchange , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  D. Bhattacharya,et al.  Tertiary endosymbiosis driven genome evolution in dinoflagellate algae. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[86]  S. Carroll,et al.  Animal Evolution and the Molecular Signature of Radiations Compressed in Time , 2005, Science.

[87]  N. Moran,et al.  Evolutionary Origins of Genomic Repertoires in Bacteria , 2005, PLoS biology.

[88]  J. Welch,et al.  Molecular dates for the "cambrian explosion": the influence of prior assumptions. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[89]  J. Archibald,et al.  Jumping Genes and Shrinking Genomes ‐ Probing the Evolution of Eukaryotic Photosynthesis with Genomics , 2005, IUBMB life.

[90]  Céline Brochier,et al.  An emerging phylogenetic core of Archaea: phylogenies of transcription and translation machineries converge following addition of new genome sequences , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[91]  B. Snel,et al.  Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.

[92]  B Franz Lang,et al.  The tree of eukaryotes. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[93]  S. Adl,et al.  The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists , 2005, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[94]  Leonard Susskind,et al.  The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , 2005 .

[95]  Anthropic Reasoning , 2005, Science.

[96]  Boris G. Mirkin,et al.  Ancestral paralogs and pseudoparalogs and their role in the emergence of the eukaryotic cell , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[97]  S Blair Hedges,et al.  Molecular clocks do not support the Cambrian explosion. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[98]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Paradigm change in evolutionary microbiology. , 2005, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[99]  Ricardo Guerrero,et al.  The last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA): Acquisition of cytoskeletal motility from aerotolerant spirochetes in the Proterozoic Eon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Laura Wegener Parfrey,et al.  Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[101]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Evolutionary genomics of nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses. , 2006, Virus research.

[102]  D Penny,et al.  Genomics and the Irreducible Nature of Eukaryote Cells , 2006, Science.

[103]  Andrei Linde,et al.  Many Worlds in One: The Search for Other Universes , 2006 .

[104]  Eugene V. Koonin,et al.  Introns and the origin of nucleus–cytosol compartmentalization , 2006, Nature.

[105]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[106]  Raphael Bousso Holographic probabilities in eternal inflation. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[107]  S. Carroll,et al.  Bushes in the Tree of Life , 2006, PLoS biology.

[108]  E. Koonin,et al.  The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells , 2006, Biology Direct.

[109]  W. Martin,et al.  Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges , 2006, Nature.

[110]  S. Conway Morris Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian ‘explosion’ , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[111]  E. Davidson,et al.  Response to Comment on "Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans" , 2006, Science.

[112]  L. Hug,et al.  The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[113]  E. Koonin The origin of introns and their role in eukaryogenesis: a compromise solution to the introns-early versus introns-late debate? , 2006, Biology Direct.

[114]  E. Koonin The cosmological model of eternal inflation and the transition from chance to biological evolution in the history of life: The possibility of chance emergence of the replication and translation systems, and the protein superfolds , 2007, q-bio/0701023.

[115]  D. Bhattacharya,et al.  Phylogenomic analysis supports the monophyly of cryptophytes and haptophytes and the association of rhizaria with chromalveolates. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[116]  M. Dine The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , 2007 .

[117]  Eric Bapteste,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis , 2007 .

[118]  Dieter Braun,et al.  Extreme accumulation of nucleotides in simulated hydrothermal pore systems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[119]  E. Koonin,et al.  The Evolution of Eukaryotes , 2007, Science.

[120]  Many Worlds in One , 2001, gr-qc/0102010.

[121]  E. Koonin An RNA-making reactor for the origin of life , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[122]  Bas E. Dutilh,et al.  Assessment of phylogenomic and orthology approaches for phylogenetic inference , 2007, Bioinform..