The number of functional olfactory receptor genes and the relative size of olfactory brain structures are poor predictors of olfactory discrimination performance with enantiomers.

The ability of four squirrel monkeys and three pigtail macaques to distinguish between nine enantiomeric odor pairs sharing an isopropenyl group at the chiral center was investigated in terms of a conditioning paradigm. All animals from both species were able to discriminate between the optical isomers of limonene, carvone, dihydrocarvone, dihydrocarveole and dihydrocarvyl acetate, whereas they failed to distinguish between the (+)- and (-)-forms of perillaaldehyde and limonene oxide. The pigtail macaques, but not the squirrel monkeys, also discriminated between the antipodes of perillaalcohol and isopulegol. A comparison of the across-task patterns of discrimination performance shows a high degree of similarity among the two primate species and also between these nonhuman primates and human subjects tested in an earlier study on the same tasks. These findings suggest that between-species comparisons of the relative size of olfactory brain structures or of the number of functional olfactory receptor genes are poor predictors of olfactory discrimination performance with enantiomers.

[1]  M. Laska Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for enantiomers with an isopropenyl group at the chiral center. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[2]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Loss of Olfactory Receptor Genes Coincides with the Acquisition of Full Trichromatic Vision in Primates , 2004, PLoS biology.

[3]  M. Laska,et al.  Assessing olfactory performance in a new world primate, Saimiri sciureus , 1993, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  A. Blancher,et al.  The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. M. Mozell,et al.  A mass transport model of olfaction. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  G. Ohloff,et al.  Structure-Odor Relationships , 1994 .

[8]  E. Brenna,et al.  Enantioselective perception of chiral odorants , 2003 .

[9]  R. Apfelbach,et al.  Concanavalin A application to the olfactory epithelium reveals different sensory neuron populations for the odour pair d- and l-carvone , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  M. Laska,et al.  A two-choice discrimination method to assess olfactory performance in pigtailed macaques, Macaca nemestrina , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  M. Afshar,et al.  Towards structural models of molecular recognition in olfactory receptors. , 1998, Biochimie.

[12]  Gustavo Glusman,et al.  The complete human olfactory subgenome. , 2001, Genome research.

[13]  L. Buck,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors. , 1992, Society of General Physiologists series.

[14]  C. Galizia,et al.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica). , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  M. Laska,et al.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[16]  G. Ohloff,et al.  Scent and Fragrances , 1994 .

[17]  Karen J. Rossiter,et al.  Structure−Odor Relationships , 1996 .

[18]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  W. König,et al.  Stereochemical analysis of constituents of essential oils and flavor compounds by enantioselective capillary gas chromatography , 1990 .

[20]  Manfred Meier,et al.  Enantioselectivity in Odor Perception Synthesis and Olfactory Properties of the New Tricyclic Sandalwood Odorant Fleursandol , 2004 .

[21]  F. Shahidi,et al.  Flavor chemistry : trends and developments , 1989 .

[22]  G. Ohloff,et al.  Scent and Fragrances: The Fascination of Odors and their Chemical Perspectives , 1994 .

[23]  Stuart Anderson,et al.  Trends and Developments , 2004 .

[24]  M. Laska,et al.  Odor structure-activity relationships of carboxylic acids correspond between squirrel monkeys and humans. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[25]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. , 1997, Chemical senses.