Mental Imagery Changes Multisensory Perception

Multisensory interactions are the norm in perception, and an abundance of research on the interaction and integration of the senses has demonstrated the importance of combining sensory information from different modalities on our perception of the external world. However, although research on mental imagery has revealed a great deal of functional and neuroanatomical overlap between imagery and perception, this line of research has primarily focused on similarities within a particular modality and has yet to address whether imagery is capable of leading to multisensory integration. Here, we devised novel versions of classic multisensory paradigms to systematically examine whether imagery is capable of integrating with perceptual stimuli to induce multisensory illusions. We found that imagining an auditory stimulus at the moment two moving objects met promoted an illusory bounce percept, as in the classic cross-bounce illusion; an imagined visual stimulus led to the translocation of sound toward the imagined stimulus, as in the classic ventriloquist illusion; and auditory imagery of speech stimuli led to a promotion of an illusory speech percept in a modified version of the McGurk illusion. Our findings provide support for perceptually based theories of imagery and suggest that neuronal signals produced by imagined stimuli can integrate with signals generated by real stimuli of a different sensory modality to create robust multisensory percepts. These findings advance our understanding of the relationship between imagery and perception and provide new opportunities for investigating how the brain distinguishes between endogenous and exogenous sensory events.

[1]  S. J. Segal,et al.  Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Object familiarity modulates effective connectivity during haptic shape perception , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  B. Wallace,et al.  Apparent equivalence between perception and imagery in the production of various visual illusions , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[9]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Hearing mouth shapes: Sound symbolism and the reverse McGurk effect , 2012, i-Perception.

[11]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[13]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[14]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Sounds exaggerate visual shape , 2012, Cognition.

[16]  M. Wallace,et al.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[18]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.

[19]  Jaeseung Jeong,et al.  Auditory Imagery Modulates Frequency-specific Areas in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Integrating visual mental images and visual percepts: new evidence for depictive representations , 2011, Psychological research.

[21]  Amir Amedi,et al.  A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation , 2009, Brain Topography.

[22]  R. Malach,et al.  Negative BOLD Differentiates Visual Imagery and Perception , 2005, Neuron.

[23]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Imagery and perception share cortical representations of content and location. , 2012, Cerebral Cortex.

[24]  B. Stein,et al.  Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. , 1983, Science.

[25]  Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  Simon Lacey,et al.  Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  R. Campbell,et al.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex , 2000, Current Biology.

[30]  A. Halpern,et al.  Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Megan A. K. Peters,et al.  0 + 1 > 1 , 2012, Psychological science.

[32]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental Imagery of Visual Motion Modifies the Perception of Roll-Vection Stimulation , 2001, Perception.

[33]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual mental imagery and visual perception: Structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Automatic audiovisual integration in speech perception , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[36]  Frank Tong,et al.  The Functional Impact of Mental Imagery on Conscious Perception , 2008, Current Biology.

[37]  D. Vaitl,et al.  Utilizing the ventriloquism-effect to investigate audio-visual binding , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .

[39]  M. Hallett,et al.  Neural correlates of cross-modal binding , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  S Shimojo,et al.  Attentional Modulation in Perception of Visual Motion Events , 1998, Perception.

[41]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location , 1998 .

[44]  Stefan Geyer,et al.  Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural foundations of imagery , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Fabrizio Leo,et al.  Independent mechanisms for ventriloquism and multisensory integration as revealed by theta‐burst stimulation , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.