Abstract Regression-kriging (RK) is becoming an important tool in geostatistics because of the availability of many covariates at high spatial resolution with the advancement in proximal and remote-sensing with positioning technologies. This paper presents the application of a new local RK algorithm for prediction of soil properties. The algorithm was tested using 985 observations for prediction of soil pH, clay content and carbon content in the lower Hunter Valley of New South Wales in Australia. Environmental covariates for the area were compiled. First, the covariates used in regression analysis for each of the soil properties were obtained through a step-wise regression analysis. Secondly, different spatial prediction methods were examined. Finally, the prediction efficiency of various techniques was tested at validation sites using the standardised squared deviation as a measure of the goodness of theoretical estimates. The results from validation showed that the local RK method does not always present the best predictions, but for specific cases it may be highly accurate. We conclude that local RK performance depends on the actual soil and environmental factor relationships, and in general performs no worse than global RK. Furthermore, the advantage of local RK is that it can provide an approach to understand how much the regression models and variogram models change across a region. We have developed a software programme named RKGuider to carry out the local RK steps automatically. Further investigation and numerous datasets are required to verify the algorithm.
[1]
L. García,et al.
Comparison of Regression Kriging and Cokriging Techniques to Esti- mate Soil Salinity Using Landsat Images
,
2009
.
[2]
B. Minasny,et al.
The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms
,
2005
.
[3]
B. Minasny,et al.
Spatial prediction of soil properties using EBLUP with the Matérn covariance function
,
2007
.
[4]
Marc Voltz,et al.
A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information
,
1990
.
[5]
Luis A. Garcia,et al.
Comparison of Ordinary Kriging, Regression Kriging, and Cokriging Techniques to Estimate Soil Salinity Using LANDSAT Images
,
2010
.
[6]
Tomislav Hengl,et al.
A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping
,
2009
.
[7]
Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.
About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies
,
2007,
Comput. Geosci..
[8]
R. M. Lark,et al.
A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey
,
2000
.
[9]
Edzer J. Pebesma.
The Role of External Variables and GIS Databases in Geostatistical Analysis
,
2006,
Trans. GIS.
[10]
Sabine Grunwald,et al.
Inferences from fluctuations in the local variogram about the assumption of stationarity in the variance
,
2008
.
[11]
Budiman Minasny,et al.
Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the Chelif Valley, Algeria, using local ordinary kriging with local variograms versus whole-area variogram
,
2001
.