Multivariate Analysis of Radiologists' Usage of Phrases that Convey Diagnostic Certainty.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To quantify the use of Diagnostic Certainty Phrases (DCP) in radiology reports, including DCPs with good agreement (including "diagnostic of," "unlikely" and "represents") in connoting degree of certainty between providers based on previous studies; and to assess whether modality, presence of a trainee, radiologic subspecialty, and individual radiologists are associated with the usage of DCPs with good agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, IRB-approved study was conducted at an academic medical center. Radiology reports that contain DCPs were identified using information retrieval from all reports generated in 2016, excluding mammograms, obstetrical ultrasound, bone densitometry, and interventional studies. DCPs connoting good agreement were further noted. Of the reports that contained DCPs, a two-level hierarchical generalized linear model with attending as the level-two variable was performed comparing the use of DCP with good agreement while considering trainee involvement, modality, and subspecialty. RESULTS A total of 159,151 reports out of 370,881 were found to have at least one DCP (43%). Reports of CT scans had the most number of DCP (68% of all CT reports). Breast and abdomen subspecialties were associated with use of DCP with good agreement. There was significant variation in use of DCP with good agreement between physicians that could not be explained by modality, trainee presence, and subspecialty. CONCLUSION Phrases to convey diagnostic certainty were commonly used in radiology reports. There is wide variation in usage of DCP with good agreement. Future interventions to reduce variation in use of DCPs may reduce ambiguity and improve quality of radiology reports.

[1]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? , 2003, Academic radiology.

[2]  B J McNeil,et al.  Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. , 2000, Radiology.

[3]  Carson A. Wick,et al.  Trainees May Add Value to Patient Care by Decreasing Addendum Utilization in Radiology Reports. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  H. Jadvar,et al.  Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[5]  J H Galla,et al.  Properdin deficiency with IgA nephropathy. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  David L Weiss,et al.  Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Creating and Curating a Terminology for Radiology: Ontology Modeling and Analysis , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  H. Hricak,et al.  Improving Communication of Diagnostic Radiology Findings through Structured Reporting 1 , 2011 .

[9]  R. A. Gagliardi,et al.  The evolution of the X-ray report. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Bruce I. Reiner Strategies for Radiology Reporting and Communication Part 3: Patient Communication and Education , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  L. Berlin,et al.  Pitfalls of the vague radiology report. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  F. Hall,et al.  Language of the radiology report: primer for residents and wayward radiologists. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  D. Sahani,et al.  Differing Interpretations of Report Terminology Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiologists. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  Report of the ACR's Economics Committee on Value-Based Payment Models. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[15]  D. Larson,et al.  Communication in diagnostic radiology: meeting the challenges of complexity. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Jiyon Lee,et al.  Practical and illustrated summary of updated BI-RADS for ultrasonography , 2016, Ultrasonography.