Beneficial effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring system on glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) provides detailed information on glucose patterns and trends, thus allowing the patients to manage their diabetes more effectively. DESIGN The aim of this study was to explore the potential beneficial effects of the use of RT-CGM on diabetes management compared with self blood glucose measurement (SBGM) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched through by two independent investigators for RCTs concerning the use of RT-CGM in patients with T1DM. Only studies with a similar insulin regimen in the experimental and control groups were included in the analysis. RESULTS Seven RCTs (n=948) met the inclusion criteria. Combined data from all studies showed better HbA1c reduction in subjects using RT-CGM compared with those using SBGM (mean difference (MD) -0.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): from -0.34 to -0.17; P<0.001). Patients treated with insulin pump and RT-CGM had a lower HbA1c level compared with subjects managed with insulin pump and SBGM (four RCTs, n=497; MD -0.26; 95% CI: from -0.43 to -0.10; P=0.002). The benefits of applying RT-CGM were not associated with an increasing rate of major hypoglycemic episodes. The use of RT-CGM for over 60-70% of time was associated with a significant lowering of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS RT-CGM is more beneficial than SBGM in reducing HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this system in the pediatric population, especially in very young children.

[1]  I. Hirsch,et al.  Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? , 2005, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[2]  Practical Aspects of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitors , 2010, The Diabetes educator.

[3]  Michael O'Grady,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Rubin,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes for an integrated real-time continuous glucose monitoring/insulin pump system. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[5]  D. Golicki,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Diabetologia.

[6]  O. Schnell,et al.  Postprandial Hyperglycemia and Glycemic Variability , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[7]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  L. Thabane,et al.  The effect of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGMS) versus intermittent whole blood finger-stick glucose monitoring (SBGM) on hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c) levels in Type I diabetic patients: a systematic review. , 2008, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[9]  Matthew Page,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  M. Rewers,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes , 2007, Pediatric diabetes.

[11]  T. Jones,et al.  Glycaemic impact of patient-led use of sensor-guided pump therapy in type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial , 2009, Diabetologia.

[12]  Miguel Pereira,et al.  Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[13]  L. V. Van Gaal,et al.  A Review of Current Evidence with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Diabetes , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[14]  M. Knip,et al.  Sensor-augmented pump therapy from the diagnosis of childhood type 1 diabetes: results of the Paediatric Onset Study (ONSET) after 12 months of treatment , 2010, Diabetologia.

[15]  H. Szajewska,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs. multiple daily injections in children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized control trials , 2009, Pediatric diabetes.

[16]  Christopher G. Parkin,et al.  Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[17]  Darrell M. Wilson,et al.  The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes , 2010 .

[18]  L. B. E. A. Hoeks,et al.  Real‐time continuous glucose monitoring system for treatment of diabetes: a systematic review , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[19]  T. Jones,et al.  Hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes: current issues and controversies , 2003, Pediatric diabetes.

[20]  Eric Renard,et al.  Incremental valúe of continuous glucose monitoring when starting pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: the REALTREND Study , 2010 .

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Cindy Farquhar,et al.  3 The Cochrane Library , 1996 .

[23]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[24]  V. Basevi Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011 , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[25]  F. Ovalle,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009 .