EFFICIENT PARALLEL HYBRID COMPUTATIONS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL WAVE EQUATION PRESTACK DEPTH IMAGING

Three-dimensional wave equation prestack depth imaging is an im- portant tool in reconstructing images of complex subsurface structures, and it has become a technique gaining wide popularity in oil and gas industry. This is a large-scale scientific computing problem and can be considered a process of data continuation downward with the surface data or the boundary data, such as the shot-gather data. In this paper, we first discuss the decomposi- tion of a two-way wave equation and investigate four different approaches to approximate the square-root operator. Using the known shot-gather data as input, an unconditional stable hybrid method for the wavefield extrapolation is presented. The most attractive feature of the proposed method is that it has a natural parallel characteristic and can be effectively implemented using a cluster of PCs, in which each processor performs its own shot-gather imaging in- dependently. To demonstrate the computational efficiency and the power of the parallel hybrid algorithm, we present two case studies: one is the well-known SEG/EAEG subsalt model which has been commonly used for validation of the prestack depth imaging algorithms, and the other is the application to a 3D wavefield extrapolation problem with real data provided by the China Na- tional Petroleum Corporation. The results clearly show the capability of the proposed method, and it demonstrates that the algorithm can be effectively implemented as a practical engineering tool for 3D prestack depth imaging.

[1]  Piero Sguazzero,et al.  Migration of seismic data by phase-shift plus interpolation: Geophysics , 1984 .

[2]  Jenö Gazdag,et al.  Wave equation migration with the phase-shift method , 1978 .

[3]  Dave Hale,et al.  Stable explicit depth extrapolation of seismic wavefields , 1990 .

[4]  Alexander M. Popovici Prestack migration by split‐step DSR , 1996 .

[5]  R. Stolt MIGRATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM , 1978 .

[6]  D. Ristow,et al.  3-D implicit finite‐difference migration by multiway splitting , 1997 .

[7]  Dave Hale Stable, Explicit Depth Extrapolation of Seismic Wavefields , 1990 .

[8]  E. Baysal,et al.  Reverse time migration , 1983 .

[9]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Prestack depth migration by means of controlled illumination , 1994 .

[10]  William A. Schneider,et al.  INTEGRAL FORMULATION FOR MIGRATION IN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS , 1978 .

[11]  Patrick Joly,et al.  Splitting of Operators, Alternate Directions, and Paraxial Approximations for the Three-Dimensional Wave Equation , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  D. Ristow,et al.  Fourier finite-difference migration , 1994 .

[13]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  The migration of common midpoint slant stacks , 1984 .

[14]  J. Claerbout Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping , 1971 .

[15]  Louis A. Romero,et al.  Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration , 2000 .

[16]  Biondo Biondi,et al.  3-D Prestack Migration of Common-azimuth Data , 1994 .

[17]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Split-Step Fourier Migration , 1990 .

[18]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Imaging the Earth's Interior , 1985 .

[19]  Methods for wave equation prestack depth migration and numerical experiments , 2004 .

[20]  Wensheng Zhang,et al.  3D PRESTACK DEPTH MIGRATION WITH FACTORIZATION FOUR-WAY SPLITTING SCHEME , 2006 .

[21]  A. Majda,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves , 1977 .

[22]  Björn Engquist,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for wave-equation migration , 1980 .