The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Jamali,et al. Single dose pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of glucosamine in the rat. , 2002, Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques.
[2] N. Hannett,et al. Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains , 2018, Cell.
[3] V. Corces,et al. Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[4] E. Furlong,et al. Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology , 2018, Science.
[5] S. Lomvardas,et al. Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity , 2018, bioRxiv.
[6] Max W. Chang,et al. Transcription Elongation Can Affect Genome 3D Structure , 2018, Cell.
[7] P. Cramer,et al. RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation , 2018, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.
[8] Daniel S. Day,et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.
[9] Charles H. Li,et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates , 2018, Science.
[10] W. Bickmore,et al. Nuclear pore density controls heterochromatin reorganization during senescence , 2018, bioRxiv.
[11] E. Furlong,et al. The Insulator Protein CTCF Is Required for Correct Hox Gene Expression, but Not for Embryonic Development in Drosophila , 2018, Genetics.
[12] Jia-Ming Chang,et al. Polycomb-Dependent Chromatin Looping Contributes to Gene Silencing during Drosophila Development. , 2018, Molecular cell.
[13] Lucas J. T. Kaaij,et al. Systemic Loss and Gain of Chromatin Architecture throughout Zebrafish Development , 2018, Cell reports.
[14] B. Tabak,et al. Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus , 2018, Cell.
[15] Thomas Gregor,et al. Dynamic interplay between enhancer-promoter topology and gene activity , 2018, Nature Genetics.
[16] Marjon S. van Ruiten,et al. SMC Complexes: Universal DNA Looping Machines with Distinct Regulators. , 2018, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[17] I. Grummt,et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleolar architecture. , 2018, Current opinion in cell biology.
[18] B. van Steensel,et al. TSA-Seq Mapping of Nuclear Genome Organization , 2018, bioRxiv.
[19] Daniel Jost,et al. TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila , 2018, Science Advances.
[20] H. Madhani,et al. Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[21] L. Mirny,et al. Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22] Judith B. Zaugg,et al. CTCF-Mediated Chromatin Loops between Promoter and Gene Body Regulate Alternative Splicing across Individuals. , 2017, Cell systems.
[23] J. Ellenberg,et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins , 2017, The EMBO journal.
[24] A. Tanay,et al. Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development , 2017, Cell.
[25] Stefan Mundlos,et al. The three-dimensional genome: regulating gene expression during pluripotency and development , 2017, Development.
[26] Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al. Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains , 2017, Cell.
[27] Nuno A. Fonseca,et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal , 2017, Nature.
[28] Aaron N. Chang,et al. Non-coding Transcription Instructs Chromatin Folding and Compartmentalization to Dictate Enhancer-Promoter Communication and T Cell Fate , 2017, Cell.
[29] Yijun Ruan,et al. Evolutionarily Conserved Principles Predict 3D Chromatin Organization. , 2017, Molecular cell.
[30] Daniel S. Kim,et al. Lineage-specific dynamic and pre-established enhancer–promoter contacts cooperate in terminal differentiation , 2017, Nature Genetics.
[31] T. Jenuwein,et al. Major satellite repeat RNA stabilize heterochromatin retention of Suv39h enzymes by RNA-nucleosome association and RNA:DNA hybrid formation , 2017, eLife.
[32] Wei Zhu,et al. 3D Chromatin Structures of Mature Gametes and Structural Reprogramming during Mammalian Embryogenesis , 2017, Cell.
[33] Jing He,et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development , 2017, Nature.
[34] Matthew E. Gosden,et al. Tissue-specific CTCF/Cohesin-mediated chromatin architecture delimits enhancer interactions and function in vivo , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.
[35] Robert S. Illingworth,et al. PARP mediated chromatin unfolding is coupled to long-range enhancer activation , 2017, bioRxiv.
[36] Mustafa Mir,et al. Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation , 2017, Nature.
[37] K. Neugebauer,et al. Activation of transcription enforces the formation of distinct nuclear bodies in zebrafish embryos , 2017, RNA biology.
[38] Alma L. Burlingame,et al. Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin , 2017, Nature.
[39] Brian D. Slaughter,et al. Condensin II is anchored by TFIIIC and H3K4me3 in the mammalian genome and supports the expression of active dense gene clusters , 2017, Science Advances.
[40] L. Mirny,et al. Targeted Degradation of CTCF Decouples Local Insulation of Chromosome Domains from Genomic Compartmentalization , 2017, Cell.
[41] Bas van Steensel,et al. Lamina-Associated Domains: Links with Chromosome Architecture, Heterochromatin, and Gene Repression , 2017, Cell.
[42] A. Németh,et al. Disruption of the UBF gene induces aberrant somatic nucleolar bodies and disrupts embryo nucleolar precursor bodies. , 2017, Gene.
[43] Peter H. L. Krijger,et al. The Cohesin Release Factor WAPL Restricts Chromatin Loop Extension , 2017, Cell.
[44] Niels Galjart,et al. Cohesin is positioned in mammalian genomes by transcription, CTCF and Wapl , 2017, Nature.
[45] Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al. Chromatin Architecture Emerges during Zygotic Genome Activation Independent of Transcription , 2017, Cell.
[46] E. Heard,et al. X chromosome inactivation: new players in the initiation of gene silencing , 2017, F1000Research.
[47] T. Misteli,et al. Causes and consequences of nuclear gene positioning , 2017, Journal of Cell Science.
[48] Kin Chung Lam,et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies , 2017, bioRxiv.
[49] S. Q. Xie,et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) , 2017, Nature.
[50] R. Young,et al. A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.
[51] James Taylor,et al. Chromatin States in Mouse Sperm Correlate with Embryonic and Adult Regulatory Landscapes. , 2017, Cell reports.
[52] J. Brickner,et al. Genetic and epigenetic control of the spatial organization of the genome , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.
[53] Frank Alber,et al. Comprehensive characterization of neutrophil genome topology , 2017, bioRxiv.
[54] A. Németh,et al. Nucleolus association of chromosomal domains is largely maintained in cellular senescence despite massive nuclear reorganisation , 2016, bioRxiv.
[55] W. Huber,et al. The Shh Topological Domain Facilitates the Action of Remote Enhancers by Reducing the Effects of Genomic Distances , 2016, Developmental cell.
[56] J. Wysocka,et al. Ever-Changing Landscapes: Transcriptional Enhancers in Development and Evolution , 2016, Cell.
[57] D. Dickel,et al. The Ties That Bind: Mapping the Dynamic Enhancer-Promoter Interactome , 2016, Cell.
[58] S. Russell,et al. Regions of very low H3K27me3 partition the Drosophila genome into topological domains , 2016, bioRxiv.
[59] Brian J. Beliveau,et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes , 2016, Science.
[60] Howard Y. Chang,et al. Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse , 2016, Nature.
[61] Neva C. Durand,et al. Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[62] Michael T Laub,et al. Transcription rate and transcript length drive formation of chromosomal interaction domain boundaries , 2016, The EMBO journal.
[63] Jesse R. Dixon,et al. Chromatin Domains: The Unit of Chromosome Organization. , 2016, Molecular cell.
[64] L. Mirny,et al. Formation of Chromosomal Domains in Interphase by Loop Extrusion , 2015, bioRxiv.
[65] Chang Liu,et al. Genome-wide analysis of chromatin packing in Arabidopsis thaliana at single-gene resolution , 2016, Genome research.
[66] S. Gasser,et al. Spatial segregation of heterochromatin: Uncovering functionality in a multicellular organism , 2016, Nucleus.
[67] Davide Marenduzzo,et al. Simulated binding of transcription factors to active and inactive regions folds human chromosomes into loops, rosettes and topological domains , 2016, Nucleic acids research.
[68] J. Dekker,et al. A Guide to Packing Your DNA , 2016, Cell.
[69] P. O’Farrell,et al. TALE-light imaging reveals maternally guided, H3K9me2/3-independent emergence of functional heterochromatin in Drosophila embryos , 2016, Genes & development.
[70] L. Mirny,et al. The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication , 2016, Cell.
[71] E. Wieschaus,et al. Nucleation by rRNA Dictates the Precision of Nucleolus Assembly , 2016, Current Biology.
[72] Ilya M. Flyamer,et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains , 2016, Genome research.
[73] Shawn M. Gillespie,et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas , 2015, Nature.
[74] Peter H. L. Krijger,et al. CTCF Binding Polarity Determines Chromatin Looping. , 2015, Molecular cell.
[75] K. Rippe,et al. Alu element‐containing RNAs maintain nucleolar structure and function , 2015, The EMBO journal.
[76] Romain Koszul,et al. Condensin- and Replication-Mediated Bacterial Chromosome Folding and Origin Condensation Revealed by Hi-C and Super-resolution Imaging. , 2015, Molecular cell.
[77] R. Martienssen,et al. RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[78] Jeannie T. Lee,et al. Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. , 2015, Science.
[79] Nir Friedman,et al. Mapping Nucleosome Resolution Chromosome Folding in Yeast by Micro-C , 2015, Cell.
[80] A. Visel,et al. Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions , 2015, Cell.
[81] J. Dekker,et al. Condensin-Driven Remodeling of X-Chromosome Topology during Dosage Compensation , 2015, Nature.
[82] Zhaohui S. Qin,et al. Widespread rearrangement of 3D chromatin organization underlies polycomb-mediated stress-induced silencing. , 2015, Molecular cell.
[83] Dmitry A Afonnikov,et al. Comparison of the three-dimensional organization of sperm and fibroblast genomes using the Hi-C approach , 2015, Genome Biology.
[84] Michael J. Sweredoski,et al. The Xist lncRNA directly interacts with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3 , 2015, Nature.
[85] D. Duboule,et al. Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[86] Giacomo Cavalli,et al. The Role of Chromosome Domains in Shaping the Functional Genome , 2015, Cell.
[87] Pedro P. Rocha,et al. CTCF establishes discrete functional chromatin domains at the Hox clusters during differentiation , 2015, Science.
[88] Neva C. Durand,et al. A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.
[89] Robert S. Illingworth,et al. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells , 2014, Science.
[90] C. Kooperberg,et al. Functional redundancy in the nuclear compartmentalization of the late-replicating genome , 2014, Nucleus.
[91] Philip D. Gregory,et al. Reactivation of Developmentally Silenced Globin Genes by Forced Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.
[92] Zhiping Weng,et al. High-resolution mapping of chromatin packaging in mouse embryonic stem cells and sperm. , 2014, Developmental cell.
[93] Wolfgang Huber,et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase , 2014, Nature.
[94] Zhaohui S. Qin,et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy , 2014, Genome Biology.
[95] A. Belmont,et al. HSP70 Transgene Directed Motion to Nuclear Speckles Facilitates Heat Shock Activation , 2014, Current Biology.
[96] J. Lieb,et al. What are super-enhancers? , 2014, Nature Genetics.
[97] S. Gasser,et al. SIR proteins and the assembly of silent chromatin in budding yeast. , 2013, Annual review of genetics.
[98] L. Mirny,et al. High-Resolution Mapping of the Spatial Organization of a Bacterial Chromosome , 2013, Science.
[99] Matteo Pellegrini,et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. , 2013, Cell stem cell.
[100] G. Schroth,et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture , 2013, The EMBO journal.
[101] Job Dekker,et al. Organization of the Mitotic Chromosome , 2013, Science.
[102] Yun Zhu,et al. The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors , 2013, Nature.
[103] E. Delbarre,et al. Lamin A/C-promoter interactions specify chromatin state–dependent transcription outcomes , 2013, Genome research.
[104] D. Duboule,et al. A Switch Between Topological Domains Underlies HoxD Genes Collinearity in Mouse Limbs , 2013, Science.
[105] Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al. Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.
[106] W. Bickmore,et al. Single-Cell Dynamics of Genome-Nuclear Lamina Interactions , 2013, Cell.
[107] Tom Misteli,et al. Functional implications of genome topology , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[108] C. Doe,et al. Developmentally Regulated Subnuclear Genome Reorganization Restricts Neural Progenitor Competence in Drosophila , 2013, Cell.
[109] Zhaohui S. Qin,et al. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. , 2012, Molecular cell.
[110] V. Corces,et al. tDNA insulators and the emerging role of TFIIIC in genome organization , 2012, Transcription.
[111] Data production leads,et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .
[112] P. Gregory,et al. Controlling Long-Range Genomic Interactions at a Native Locus by Targeted Tethering of a Looping Factor , 2012, Cell.
[113] J. Sedat,et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre , 2012, Nature.
[114] Jesse R. Dixon,et al. Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.
[115] A. Tanay,et al. Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.
[116] O. Bensaude,et al. Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription. Which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity? , 2011, Transcription.
[117] B. van Steensel,et al. Interactions among Polycomb Domains Are Guided by Chromosome Architecture , 2011, PLoS genetics.
[118] A. Hyman,et al. Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[119] Benjamin Leblanc,et al. Polycomb-Dependent Regulatory Contacts between Distant Hox Loci in Drosophila , 2011, Cell.
[120] Nazim Madhavji,et al. Organization , 2020, WER.
[121] B. van Steensel,et al. The Insulator Protein SU(HW) Fine-Tunes Nuclear Lamina Interactions of the Drosophila Genome , 2010, PloS one.
[122] A. Belmont,et al. Hsp70 gene association with nuclear speckles is Hsp70 promoter specific , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.
[123] A. Lamond,et al. High-Resolution Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals That Specific Chromatin Domains from Most Human Chromosomes Associate with Nucleoli , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.
[124] A. Probst,et al. A strand-specific burst in transcription of pericentric satellites is required for chromocenter formation and early mouse development. , 2010, Developmental cell.
[125] Guillaume J. Filion,et al. Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells , 2010, Cell.
[126] P. Flicek,et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. , 2010, Molecular cell.
[127] A. Conesa,et al. Initial Genomics of the Human Nucleolus , 2010, PLoS genetics.
[128] M. Fornerod,et al. Nucleoporins Directly Stimulate Expression of Developmental and Cell-Cycle Genes Inside the Nucleoplasm , 2010, Cell.
[129] Jennifer A. Mitchell,et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.
[130] I. Amit,et al. Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .
[131] Thomas Cremer,et al. Nuclear Architecture of Rod Photoreceptor Cells Adapts to Vision in Mammalian Evolution , 2009, Cell.
[132] C. Bonifer,et al. The LPS-Induced Transcriptional Upregulation of the Chicken Lysozyme Locus Involves CTCF Eviction and Noncoding RNA Transcription , 2008, Molecular cell.
[133] L. Wessels,et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions , 2008, Nature.
[134] W. de Laat,et al. Maintenance of Long-Range DNA Interactions after Inhibition of Ongoing RNA Polymerase II Transcription , 2008, PloS one.
[135] D. Hernandez-Verdun,et al. Nucleolus: the fascinating nuclear body , 2007, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.
[136] Cameron S. Osborne,et al. Myc Dynamically and Preferentially Relocates to a Transcription Factory Occupied by Igh , 2007, PLoS biology.
[137] M. Vigneron,et al. CTCF Interacts with and Recruits the Largest Subunit of RNA Polymerase II to CTCF Target Sites Genome-Wide , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[138] B. Steensel,et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture–on-chip (4C) , 2006, Nature Genetics.
[139] Anne E Carpenter,et al. Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site , 2006, Current Biology.
[140] B. McStay,et al. UBF-binding site arrays form pseudo-NORs and sequester the RNA polymerase I transcription machinery. , 2005, Genes & development.
[141] Richard A Flavell,et al. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus , 2004, Nature Immunology.
[142] T. Itoh,et al. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription , 2004, Nature.
[143] P. Spierer,et al. Ectopic HP1 promotes chromosome loops and variegated silencing in Drosophila , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[144] R. Kamakaka,et al. RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II promoter complexes are heterochromatin barriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[145] Andrew S. Belmont,et al. Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.
[146] G. Almouzni,et al. The Ribosomal RNA Processing Machinery Is Recruited to the Nucleolar Domain before RNA Polymerase I during Xenopus laevis Development , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.
[147] S. Henikoff,et al. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila , 1996, Nature.
[148] B. van Steensel,et al. Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in discrete clusters in the cell nucleus. , 1995, Journal of cell science.
[149] D. Jackson,et al. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. , 1993, The EMBO journal.