Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis

The aim of this study was to contrast the validity of two opposing explanatory hypotheses about the effect of online communication on adolescents’ well-being. The displacement hypothesis predicts that online communication reduces adolescents’ well-being because it displaces time spent with existing friends, thereby reducing the quality of these friendships. In contrast, the stimulation hypothesis states that online communication stimulates well-being via its positive effect on time spent with existing friends and the quality of these friendships. We conducted an online survey among 1,210 Dutch teenagers between 10 and 17 years of age. Using mediation analyses, we found support for the stimulation hypothesis but not for the displacement hypothesis. We also found a moderating effect of type of online communication on adolescents’ well-being: Instant messaging, which was mostly used to communicate with existing friends, positively predicted well-being via the mediating variables (a) time spent with existing friends and (b) the quality of these friendships. Chat in a public chatroom, which was relatively often used to talk with strangers, had no effect on adolescents’ well-being via the mediating variables.

[1]  Michel Boivin,et al.  Attachment, Social Support, and Loneliness in Young Adulthood: A Test of Two Models , 2002 .

[2]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Friendship and the worlds of childhood. , 2001, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[3]  Jack Linchuan Qiu,et al.  Internet Connectedness and Inequality , 2001, Commun. Res..

[4]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[5]  Nancy D. Brener,et al.  The Association of Survey Setting and Mode with Self-Reported Health Risk Behaviors among High School Students , 2006 .

[6]  Erik Wästlund,et al.  Internet Blues Revisited: Replication and Extension of an Internet Paradox Study , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  W. Hartup,et al.  Friendships and adaptation in the life course. , 1997 .

[8]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Children's Positive and Negative Experiences With the Internet , 2001, Commun. Res..

[9]  W. Hartup.  The company they keep: friendships and their developmental significance. , 1996, Child development.

[10]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[11]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[12]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  The impact of home computer use on children's activities and development. , 2000, The Future of children.

[14]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  The Family and the Internet: The Israeli Case* , 2003 .

[15]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide , 2004, CACM.

[17]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[18]  Eric B. Weiser,et al.  The Functions of Internet Use and Their Social and Psychological Consequences , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[20]  Louis Leung,et al.  Loneliness, Self-Disclosure, and ICQ ("I Seek You") Use , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Reginald Wilson.  About the Authors , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  D. Buhrmester.  Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. , 1990, Child development.

[23]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report , 2004 .

[24]  N. Nie.  Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .

[25]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  The Relationship between Internet Activities and Depressive Symptoms in a Sample of College Freshmen , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[27]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect , 2000, Prevention Science.

[28]  Nancy K. Baym,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-Face , 2004, New Media Soc..

[29]  T. Field,et al.  The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. , 2000, Adolescence.

[30]  Yongchan Kim,et al.  Connections in the Everyday Lives of Seven Ethnic Neighborhoods , 2001 .

[31]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model , 2006 .

[32]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[33]  J. Alison Bryant,et al.  IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Tom H. A. van der Voort,et al.  Validity of children's direct estimates of time spent television viewing , 1990 .

[35]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Social Relationships and Internet Use among Adolescents in Israel , 2001 .

[36]  Lindsay H. Shaw,et al.  In Defense of the Internet: The Relationship between Internet Communication and Depression, Loneliness, Self-Esteem, and Perceived Social Support , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Brian Mustanski,et al.  Getting wired: Exploiting the internet for the collection of valid sexuality data , 2001 .

[38]  James A. McRae,et al.  An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews in a School Setting , 1998 .

[39]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Sociability: A Time Diary Study , 2008 .

[40]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[41]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[44]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[45]  A. Joinson.  Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[46]  Wendy Craig.  Childhood social development : the essential readings , 2000 .