Effect of changing partnership formation rates on the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus.

Core population groups play an important role in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Subjects in a core group may change their behavior over time and "migrate" to the noncore. The authors examined the effects of such migration on the prevalence of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) using a mathematical model. The size of the core and the migration rate from the core to the noncore were estimated from population-based sexual survey data on 8,445 Norwegians collected in 1987 and 1992. Sixty-four percent of the sample was considered without risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease. The core group made up 2.5% of the remaining sample. The migration rate from the core was estimated at 12% per year. The three types of infections analyzed exemplify three different patterns of the effect of migration on infection prevalence in the core/noncore groups: gonorrhea = no effect/no effect, Chlamydia = no effect/increase, and HIV = decrease/increase. Migration affects the basic reproductive ratio of diseases with a long infectious period more than that of diseases with a short infectious period. For HIV, this means that the later stages of infection contribute less to the basic reproductive ratio in the presence of migration. The results are qualitative and show that detailed knowledge about mixing, migration, transmission rates, and duration of infectiousness is necessary to make accurate predictions.

[1]  P. Magnus,et al.  Frequency of sexual partner change in a Norwegian population. Data distribution and covariates. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  I. de Vincenzi,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Heterosexual Partners , 1994 .

[3]  Lisa Sattenspiel,et al.  Modeling and analyzing HIV transmission: the effect of contact patterns , 1988 .

[4]  J. Heesterbeek,et al.  The basic reproduction ratio for sexually transmitted diseases. Part 2. Effects of variable HIV infectivity. , 1993, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[6]  Klaus Dietz,et al.  On the transmission dynamics of HIV , 1988 .

[7]  G. Satten,et al.  Modelling the female-to-male per-act HIV transmission probability in an emerging epidemic in Asia. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  J. Yorke,et al.  Dynamics and Control of the Transmission of Gonorrhea , 1978, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[9]  P. Magnus,et al.  The core group revisited: the effect of partner mixing and migration on the spread of gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and HIV. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.

[10]  I. Longini,et al.  Role of the primary infection in epidemics of HIV infection in gay cohorts. , 1995, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[11]  S. Gupta,et al.  The significance of sexual partner contact networks for the transmission dynamics of HIV. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[12]  Ira M. Longini,et al.  The stages of HIV infection: waiting times and infection transmission probabilities , 1989 .

[13]  F. Plummer,et al.  A general model of sexually transmitted disease epidemiology and its implications for control. , 1990, The Medical clinics of North America.