Accurate permeability characterization of preforms used in polymer matrix composite fabrication processes

The permeabilities of fabrics composed of carbon and glass fibers have been determined by utilizing both simple 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional radial flow measurements using silicone oil and motor oil as permeants. The carbon fabric is typical of that used in fabrication of aerospace grade polymer matrix composites, while the glass fabric is a 3-dimensional woven fabric that has been proposed as a standard reference material for permeability characterization. Our results indicate that reliable permeability data for fiber preforms with varying architectural complexity can be obtained provided that the experiments are performed with utmost care and that appropriate equations are used to analyze the data. In-plane permeabilities for the carbon fiber preforms from transient unidirectional constant flow rate and constant pressure experiments agreed within 5%, regardless of the preform orientation to the flow direction. Steady-state results on the same preforms showed agreement within 2% between constant flow rate and constant pressure experiments. The capillary pressure effect was shown to be negligible for the transient experiments. The maximum difference between the transient and steady state permeability values was 3%. The maximum difference between a permeability measured with unidirectional flow and the same permeability measured with radial flow is less than 10%.

[1]  John C. Berg,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of permeability and capillary pressure of thermosetting matrices in woven fabric reinforcements , 1991 .

[2]  R. E. Larson,et al.  Microscopic flow near the surface of two-dimensional porous media. Part 2. Transverse flow , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  J. Kardos,et al.  Resin flow through fiber beds during composite manufacturing processes. Part I: Review of newtonian flow through fiber beds , 1992 .

[4]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  The interaction between micro- and macro-scopic flow in RTM preforms , 1994 .

[5]  J. Kardos,et al.  Resin flow through fiber beds during composite manufacturing processes. Part II: Numerical and experimental studies of newtonian flow through ideal and actual fiber beds , 1992 .

[6]  R. Parnas,et al.  A comparison of the unidirectional and radial in-plane flow of fluids through woven composite reinforcements , 1993 .

[7]  B. R. Gebart,et al.  Permeability of Unidirectional Reinforcements for RTM , 1992 .

[8]  J. L. Kardos,et al.  The permeability and compressibility of aligned and cross‐plied carbon fiber beds during processing of composites , 1991 .

[9]  L. J. Lee,et al.  Analysis of resin injection molding in molds with preplaced fiber mats. I: Permeability and compressibility measurements , 1991 .

[10]  K. L. Adams,et al.  Permeability characteristics of multilayer fiber reinforcements. Part II: Theoretical model , 1991 .

[11]  S. Hwang,et al.  Anisotropic in‐plane permeability of fabric media , 1991 .

[12]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Permeability characterization. Part 1: A proposed standard reference fabric for permeability , 1995 .

[13]  Bernard Miller,et al.  Forced in‐plane flow of an epoxy resin in fibrous networks , 1986 .

[14]  A. B. Metzner,et al.  Flows of nonlinear fluids through porous media , 1976 .

[15]  Ludwig Rebenfeld,et al.  In-Plane Flow of Fluids in Fabrics: Structure/Flow Characterization , 1987 .

[16]  Ludwig Rebenfeld,et al.  Permeability characteristics of multilayer fiber reinforcements. Part I: Experimental observations , 1991 .

[17]  B. Mena,et al.  Viscoelastic Effects in Flow through Porous Media , 1979 .

[18]  J. Kardos,et al.  Polymeric flow through fibrous media , 1992 .

[19]  B. Khomami,et al.  Application of higher order finite element methods to viscoelastic flow in porous media , 1992 .