Standardized Data Structures in Rare Diseases: CDISC User Guides for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Huntington’s Disease

Interest in drug development for rare diseases has expanded dramatically since the Orphan Drug Act was passed in 1983, with 40% of new drug approvals in 2019 targeting orphan indications. However, limited quantitative understanding of natural history and disease progression hinders progress and increases the risks associated with rare disease drug development. Use of international data standards can assist in data harmonization and enable data exchange, integration into larger datasets, and a quantitative understanding of disease natural history. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the use of Clinical Data Interchange Consortium (CDISC) Standards in new drug submissions to help the agency efficiently and effectively receive, process, review, and archive submissions, as well as to help integrate data to answer research questions. Such databases have been at the core of biomarker qualification efforts and fit-for-purpose models endorsed by the regulators. We describe the development of CDISC therapeutic area user guides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Huntington's disease (HD) through Critical Path Institute consortia. These guides describe formalized data structures and controlled terminology to map and integrate data from different sources. This will result in increased standardization of data collection and allow integration and comparison of data from multiple studies. Integration of multiple data sets enables a quantitative understanding of disease progression, which can help overcome common challenges in clinical trial design in these, and other, rare diseases. Ultimately, clinical data standardization will lead to a faster path to regulatory approval of urgently needed new therapies for patients.

[1]  Volker D. Kern,et al.  Regulatory‐accepted drug development tools are needed to accelerate innovative CNS disease treatments , 2018, Biochemical pharmacology.

[2]  F. Muntoni,et al.  NINDS Common Data Elements for Congenital Muscular Dystrophy Clinical Research: A National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke Project. , 2018, Journal of neuromuscular diseases.

[3]  J. J. Padilla,et al.  A randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of an antisense oligonucleotide, drisapersen, in Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2018, Neuromuscular Disorders.

[4]  Vicente E. Torres,et al.  A Drug Development Tool for Trial Enrichment in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease , 2017, Kidney international reports.

[5]  Klaus Romero,et al.  Combining patient-level and summary-level data for Alzheimer’s disease modeling and simulation: a beta regression meta-analysis , 2012, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[6]  R. Finkel,et al.  Ataluren in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (ACT DMD): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[7]  Neta Zach,et al.  Big data to smart data in Alzheimer's disease: Real-world examples of advanced modeling and simulation , 2016, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[8]  R. Finkel,et al.  Towards regulatory endorsement of drug development tools to promote the application of model-informed drug development in Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2019, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[9]  S. Perlman,et al.  Assessment of neurological efficacy of idebenone in pediatric patients with Friedreich's ataxia: data from a 6-month controlled study followed by a 12-month open-label extension study , 2012, Journal of Neurology.

[10]  Jon Neville,et al.  Accelerating drug development for Alzheimer's disease through the use of data standards , 2017, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[11]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  The MSOAC approach to developing performance outcomes to measure and monitor multiple sclerosis disability , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[12]  Jon Neville,et al.  Therapeutic Area Data Standards for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Report From the Polycystic Kidney Disease Outcomes Consortium (PKDOC). , 2015, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[13]  Vicente E. Torres,et al.  Total Kidney Volume Is a Prognostic Biomarker of Renal Function Decline and Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease , 2017, Kidney international reports.

[14]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Open innovation: Towards sharing of data, models and workflows , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[15]  R. Finkel,et al.  Position Statement: Sharing of Clinical Research Data in Spinal Muscular Atrophy to Accelerate Research and Improve Outcomes for Patients , 2018, Journal of neuromuscular diseases.

[16]  Jon Neville,et al.  Understanding placebo responses in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials from the literature meta-data and CAMD database. , 2013, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[17]  Jon Neville,et al.  Development of a unified clinical trial database for Alzheimer's disease , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[18]  D Polhamus,et al.  The future is now: Model‐based clinical trial design for Alzheimer's disease , 2015, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.