Operative Treatment and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients with an Extremity Bone Tumor

Background: Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the 2 most common primary bone sarcomas, occurring predominantly in pediatric patients, with the incidence of osteosarcoma correlating with periods of peak bone-growth velocity. Although survival outcomes have plateaued over the past several decades, ongoing treatment advances have improved function, decreased infection rates, and improved other clinical outcomes in patients with bone tumors. Recently, the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial addressed the serious problem of surgical site infection (SSI) and the lack of consensus regarding the appropriate prophylactic postoperative antibiotic regimen. The objective of the present secondary analysis of the PARITY trial was to characterize the modern treatment and surgical and oncologic outcomes of pediatric patients with bone tumors at 1 year postoperatively. Methods: The PARITY trial included patients ≥12 years old with a bone tumor or soft-tissue sarcoma that was invading the femur or tibia, necessitating osseous resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. This pediatric subanalysis of the PARITY trial data included all PARITY patients ≤18 years old. As in the main PARITY study, patients were randomized to either a 5-day or 1-day course of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the development of an SSI within 1 year, and secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related adverse events, unplanned additional operations, local recurrence, metastasis, and death. Results: A total of 151 patients were included. An adjudicated SSI occurred in 27 patients (17.9%). There was no difference in the rate of any SSI between the 5-day and 1-day antibiotic groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 1.9; p = 0.82). Antibiotic-related complications occurred in 13 patients (8.6%), with no difference noted between groups (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.4; p = 0.18). A total of 45 patients (29.8%) required a return to the operating room within the first postoperative year, which corresponded with a 68.8% reoperation-free rate of survival at 1 year when accounting for competing risks. The most common reason for reoperation was infection (29 of 45; 64.4%). A total of 7 patients (4.6%) required subsequent amputation of the operative extremity, and an additional 6 patients (4.0%) required implant revision within 12 months. A total of 36 patients (23.8%) developed metastases, and 6 patients (4.0%) developed a local recurrence during the first postoperative year. A total of 11 patients (7.3%) died during the study period. There were no significant differences in oncologic outcomes between the 5-day and 1-day antibiotic groups (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.5-1.8; p = 0.92). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in surgical or oncologic outcomes between pediatric patients who underwent a 1-day versus 5-day antibiotic regimen following endoprosthetic reconstruction in the PARITY trial. Surgeons should be aware of and counsel patients and caregivers regarding the 30% rate of reoperation and the risks of infection (17.9%), death (7.3%), amputation (4.6%), and implant revision (4%) within the first postoperative year. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  Yuki Hyodo,et al.  Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response , 2022, Cureus.

[2]  Wasim Khan,et al.  Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Ewing’s Sarcoma Patients: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications and Functional Outcomes , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Comparison of Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotic Regimens After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Lower Extremity Bone Tumors , 2022, JAMA oncology.

[4]  H. Jürgens,et al.  Infectious Morbidity in Pediatric Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Sarcoma , 2021, Cancers.

[5]  Rachel B. Seymour,et al.  Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Operatively Treated High-risk Tibia Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA surgery.

[6]  M. Ghert,et al.  Bone cement as a local chemotherapeutic drug delivery carrier in orthopedic oncology: A review , 2020, Journal of bone oncology.

[7]  M. Ghert,et al.  A Review of the use of Bone Cement in Orthopedic Oncology and the Potential for Local Chemotherapeutic Drug Treatment , 2020 .

[8]  P. Choong,et al.  Musculoskeletal Infection in Orthopaedic Oncology: Assessment of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. , 2019, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  I. Uçkay,et al.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Orthopaedic Oncology - A Narrative Review of Current Concepts , 2019, Journal of bone and joint infection.

[10]  P. Ruggieri,et al.  Infection in orthopaedic oncology: crucial problem in modern reconstructive techniques. , 2019, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[11]  M. Sydes,et al.  Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[12]  N. Taniguchi,et al.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection, Including the Preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index , 2018, Nutrients.

[13]  D. Tzizik,et al.  Update on surgical site infections: The new CDC guidelines , 2018, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[14]  Daniel E Prince,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after primary tumor resection: pitfalls and benefits , 2017, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[15]  M. Bhandari,et al.  The inter-rater reliability of the diagnosis of surgical site infection in the context of a clinical trial , 2016, Bone & joint research.

[16]  F. Sim,et al.  What Is the Outcome of Allograft and Intramedullary Free Fibula (Capanna Technique) in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Bone Tumors? , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  John J Orriola,et al.  Surgical and Functional Outcomes After Limb‐Preservation Surgery for Tumor in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review , 2016, JBJS reviews.

[18]  E. Waldman,et al.  Ewing Sarcoma: A 15-Year Experience of a Single Center With the MSKCC P6 Treatment Protocol , 2016, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[19]  Xiu-chun Yu,et al.  Postoperative infection and survival in osteosarcoma patients: Reconsideration of immunotherapy for osteosarcoma. , 2015, Molecular and clinical oncology.

[20]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Intrawound vancomycin to prevent infections after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[21]  I. Lewis,et al.  Osteosarcoma treatment - where do we stand? A state of the art review. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[22]  Srinivas K. Prasad,et al.  Intraoperative Vancomycin Use in Spinal Surgery: Single Institution Experience and Microbial Trends , 2014, Spine.

[23]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  Effects of Using Intravenous Antibiotic Only Versus Local Intrawound Vancomycin Antibiotic Powder Application in Addition to Intravenous Antibiotics on Postoperative Infection in Spine Surgery in 907 Patients , 2013, Spine.

[24]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Risk factors for metastatic disease at presentation with osteosarcoma: an analysis of the SEER database. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumour surgery (PARITY): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled study , 2012, BMJ Open.

[26]  J. Healey,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2012, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumor surgery (PARITY) survey , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[28]  L. Mirabello,et al.  Using Epidemiology and Genomics to Understand Osteosarcoma Etiology , 2011, Sarcoma.

[29]  R. Gorlick,et al.  Osteosarcoma: a review of diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies. , 2010, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[30]  Peter N. Chalmers,et al.  Pediatric osteogenic sarcoma , 2010, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[31]  R. Grimer,et al.  Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  Dong Ho Kim,et al.  Osteosarcoma Developed in the Period of Maximal Growth Rate Have Inferior Prognosis , 2008, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[33]  K. S. Hall,et al.  Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  H. Gelderblom,et al.  The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. , 2008, The oncologist.

[35]  Paul A Meyers,et al.  Osteosarcoma: the addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy improves overall survival--a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  K. Sepkowitz,et al.  Prospective Identification of Risk Factors for Wound Infection After Lower Extremity Oncologic Surgery , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[37]  M. Link,et al.  Presurgical chemotherapy compared with immediate surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma: Pediatric Oncology Group Study POG-8651. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  H. Tsuchiya,et al.  Osteosarcoma around the knee. Intraepiphyseal excision and biological reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[39]  W. Shi,et al.  Second malignant neoplasms in long‐term survivors of osteosarcoma , 2002, Cancer.

[40]  W. Winkelmann,et al.  Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  W. Ward,et al.  Endoprosthetic bone reconstruction following malignant tumor resection in skeletally immature patients. , 1996, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[42]  H. Sbitany,et al.  Pediatric lower extremity sarcoma reconstruction: A review of limb salvage procedures and outcomes. , 2016, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[43]  E. McCarthy,et al.  Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of Bone. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[44]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[45]  Dong Ho Kim,et al.  Postoperative Infection and Survival in Osteosarcoma Patients , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[46]  D. Campanacci,et al.  A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. , 2007, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[47]  E. Pignotti,et al.  Osteosarcoma of the limb. Amputation or limb salvage in patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[48]  G. Heller,et al.  Osteosarcoma of the extremities: chemotherapy experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. , 1993, Cancer treatment and research.