Errors due to the truncation of the computational domain in static three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.

In electrical impedance tomography (EIT), an approximation for the internal resistivity distribution is computed based on the knowledge of the injected currents and measured voltages on the surface of the body. The currents spread out in three dimensions and therefore off-plane structures have a significant effect on the reconstructed images. A question arises: how far from the current carrying electrodes should the discretized model of the object be extended? If the model is truncated too near the electrodes, errors are produced in the reconstructed images. On the other hand if the model is extended very far from the electrodes the computational time may become too long in practice. In this paper the model truncation problem is studied with the extended finite element method. Forward solutions obtained using so-called infinite elements, long finite elements and separable long finite elements are compared to the correct solution. The effects of the truncation of the computational domain on the reconstructed images are also discussed and results from the three-dimensional (3D) sensitivity analysis are given. We show that if the finite element method with ordinary elements is used in static 3D EIT, the dimension of the problem can become fairly large if the errors associated with the domain truncation are to be avoided.

[1]  Bernhard A. Schrefler,et al.  Mapped infinite elements in soil consolidation , 1987 .

[2]  J. C. Marques,et al.  Infinite elements in quasi-static materially nonlinear problems , 1984 .

[3]  J.P. Kaipio,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  K S Rabbani,et al.  Studies on the effect of the third dimension on a two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography system. , 1991, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[5]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Nature.

[7]  B H Brown,et al.  Clinical applications of electrical impedance tomography. , 1993, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Static Three‐Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999 .

[9]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .