Structural Health Monitoring in the Railway Industry: A Review

Wayside detection monitors critical parameters relating to the condition of in-service railway vehicles. Economic decisions about the maintenance of vehicles can be made, and servicing can occur when a particular vehicle is likely to cause even small amounts of damage to the track, to itself, or when the cost of damage is significant, such as in catastrophic failure. Vehicles with poorly performing axle bearings, out-of-round (skidded or spalled) wheels, vehicles which exhibit transient lateral motion (‘hunting’), and vehicles with poorly performing brakes are all likely to fall into the category of requiring maintenance, in order to save the track and the vehicle owner's money. In the present paper, the parameters that define vehicle condition and their measurable effects are stated. There are frequently a number of wayside detection methods of inspecting a vehicle for the same vehicle condition and each of these is described in detail. This investigation reveals the need for further research to enable rollingstock owners to make better decisions about the cost of operating their vehicles, based on the output from wayside detectors and the observed trends in wheel impact.

[1]  Andrew K. Chan,et al.  Neural pattern identification of railroad wheel-bearing faults from audible acoustic signals: comparison of FFT, CWT, and DWT features , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[2]  B. Morys,et al.  ENLARGEMENT OF OUT-OF-ROUND WHEEL PROFILES ON HIGH SPEED TRAINS , 1999 .

[3]  Chris Hunt,et al.  Monitoring and Managing Wheel Condition and Loading , 1999 .

[4]  K Matoba.  DETECTION AND WARNING SYSTEMS FORM FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE , 2000 .

[5]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Railway Wheel Out-of-Roundness - Influence on Wheel/Rail Contact Forces and Track Response , 2001 .

[6]  J. E. Cline,et al.  Acoustic wayside identification of freight car roller bearing defects , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference.

[7]  Hr Widmayer.  Wheelset Diagnosis for High Speed Traffic , 1992 .

[8]  Semih Kalay,et al.  EXAMINING THE ECONOMICS OF HIGH-IMPACT WHEEL LOADS. , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Mutton,et al.  Failure modes in aluminothermic rail welds under high axle load conditions , 2004 .

[10]  W Partington.  SEMINAR ON PERMANENT WAY DEVELOPMENTS. WHEEL IMPACT LOAD MONITORING. TECHNICAL NOTE. , 1993 .

[11]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Out-of-round railway wheels-a literature survey , 2000 .

[12]  M Ward.  Development of a Semi Automatic/Automatic Rolling Stock Wheel Ultrasonic Testing Facility , 1989 .

[13]  P. G. Steets,et al.  Conrail's integrated automated wayside inspection , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference.

[14]  A Tajaddini,et al.  Statistical Behaviour of Wheel Impact Load Detectors to Various Wheel Defects , 1992 .

[15]  R. C. Leedham,et al.  Hot bearing detection with the 'SMART-BOLT' , 1990, ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads.

[16]  T. X. Wu,et al.  A hybrid model for the noise generation due to railway wheel flats , 2002 .

[17]  N Frank.  NEW RAIL COULD SOLVE ROLLING CONTACT FATIGUE , 2003 .

[18]  Cameron Lonsdale,et al.  EFFECT OF WHEEL IMPACT LOADING ON SHATTERED RIMS , 2001 .

[19]  C. O. Frederick.  The effect of wheel and rail irregularities on the track , 1978 .

[20]  A Tajaddini.  Testing the effects of wheel impact loads on bridges , 1996 .

[21]  D. E. Hackenberger,et al.  An initial feasibility study to develop a wayside cracked railroad wheel detector , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference.

[22]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  TWO SIMPLE FAST INTEGRATION METHODS FOR LARGE‐SCALE DYNAMIC PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING , 1996 .