The potential social, economic and environmental benefits of MOOCs: operational and historical comparisons with a massive ‘closed online’ course

Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) have recently become a much discussed development within higher education. Much of this debate focuses on the philosophical and operational similarities and differences between the types of MOOCs that have emerged to date, the learner completion rates and how they can be sustained. In contrast there has been much less discussion about how such courses do, or do not, fit in with existing higher education policy and practice in terms of the social, economic and environmental benefits. This paper begins to address this issue by comparing and contrasting current MOOCs with one large population ICT-enhanced, mostly online Open University UK course presented a decade earlier and how they have both served, or might serve, broader social, economic or environmental objectives. The paper concludes that while MOOCs are forcing a re-conceptualisation of higher education study, much can also be learned from previous and existing large population mainly online courses from open universities.

[1]  Martin Weller,et al.  Creating a Large-scale, Third Generation, Distance Education Course , 2000 .

[2]  Andrew Lane,et al.  ICTs and the design of sustainable higher education teaching models: an environmental assessment of UK courses , 2013 .

[3]  Andrew Lane,et al.  A review of the role of national policy and institutional mission in European distance teaching universities with respect to widening participation in higher education study through open educational resources , 2012 .

[4]  Paul O 'prey,et al.  Massive open online courses: higher education's digital moment? , 2013 .

[5]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[6]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[7]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[8]  Martin Weller,et al.  Scaling up an Online Course to Deal with 12 000 Students , 2002 .

[9]  M. Barceló,et al.  Higher Education in the World 4. Higher Education’s Commitment to Sustainability: from Understanding to Action , 2012 .

[10]  Osvaldo Rodriguez The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) , 2013 .

[11]  Andrew Lane The potential of MOOCs to widen access to, and success in, higher education study , 2013 .

[12]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  MOOCs @ Edinburgh Report #1: , 2013 .

[13]  P. McAndrew,et al.  Open Learning at a Distance: Lessons for Struggling MOOCs , 2013, Science.

[14]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Designing low carbon higher education systems: Environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems , 2008 .

[15]  Robin Mason,et al.  Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course , 2000 .

[16]  A. Lane The Social and Economic Impacts of Open Education , 2013 .

[17]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[18]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Overview and Analysis of Practices with Open Educational Resources in Adult Education in Europe , 2013 .

[19]  J. Daniel,et al.  The Impact of New Business Models for Higher Education on Student Financing , 2011 .

[20]  Shirley Williams,et al.  The impact and reach of MOOCs: a developing countries’ perspective , 2013 .

[21]  Eurostudent,et al.  The European higher education area in 2012 : Bologna process implementation report , 2012 .