MCDA Techniques in Maintenance Policy Selection

Traditionally maintenance departments have taken decisions based on their experience or supported by the advice of system sales staff or consultants. In other functions, however, decisions are taken, increasingly, based on techniques which provide an optimal, objective decision, which guarantees that it can be justified to management. Thus, maintenance departments of companies should begin to use these techniques in decision-making. Among these techniques is Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) which, due to its versatility, ease of application in some cases and excellent results in different areas of application, could increase the role of maintenance in companies and help to achieve world-class competitiveness. There are very many mathematical models techniques for optimization applied to maintenance (Wang, 2012), but most of them optimize a specific maintenance policy and have an important mathematical component which makes it impossible in practice to apply these models to industry. Nevertheless, the applicability of these models to solving real problems is a key question in maintenance (Scarf, 1997) and can be one of many reasons why there is low efficiency in maintenance in industry at the moment. There exist, in the maintenance field, many literature reviews, such, for example Baker and Christer (1994), Christer (1999), Garg and Deshmukh (2006), Dhillon and Liu (2006), Kans (2009), Sharma, Yadava, and Deshmukh (2011), Simões, Gomes, and Yasin (2011), Wang (2012), and Prajapati, Bechtel, and Ganesan (2012). There is however no article which analyzes the contributions made by applying MCDA to maintenance, unlike the large number of papers which review the literature in other fields. This chapter, therefore, sets out a review of the literature which brings together articles that apply MCDA techniques for decision-making in the choice of maintenance policy. The most commonly applied MCDA, trends in the number of contributions, the criteria applied, and possible gaps that could lead to interesting future work are suggested. Although the number of contributions is much lower than in other areas, the aim is to show those which do exist and to favour the practical application of MCDA in maintenance so as to guarantee the success of decisions in this field.

[1]  Ludo Gelders,et al.  Maintenance management decision making , 1992 .

[2]  K. Subbaiah,et al.  Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Modeling With Dynamic Continuous Review Inventory Policy , 2011 .

[3]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection , 2011 .

[4]  Wenbin Wang,et al.  An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi‐criteria decision making approach , 2009 .

[6]  Ehsan Pourjavad,et al.  Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by analytic network process with a case study in the mining industry , 2012 .

[7]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  World‐class maintenance using a computerised maintenance management system , 1998 .

[8]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Multi‐criteria decision‐making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry , 2008 .

[9]  Amik Garg,et al.  Maintenance management: literature review and directions , 2006 .

[10]  Jan Emblemsvåg,et al.  Decision support in selecting maintenance organization , 2003 .

[11]  Sandip Roy,et al.  A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance , 2010 .

[12]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS , 2004 .

[13]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach , 2012 .

[14]  N. S. Arunraj,et al.  Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. , 2010 .

[15]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization , 2011 .

[16]  Hoda Ahmed Abdelhafez,et al.  Big Data Analytics: Trends and Case Studies , 2014 .

[17]  Farnaz Ghazi Nezami,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy group decision making and factor analysis for selecting maintenance strategy , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[18]  María Carmen Carnero Selection of condition monitoring techniques using discrete probability distributions: A case study , 2009 .

[19]  G. Anand,et al.  Justification of world‐class maintenance systems using analytic hierarchy constant sum method , 2009 .

[20]  Alireza Ahmadi,et al.  SELECTION OF MAINTENANCE STRATEGY FOR AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGIES , 2010 .

[21]  Dirk Vriens,et al.  It's All in the Game: How to Use Simulation-Games for Competitive Intelligence and How to Support Them by ICT , 2003 .

[22]  A. H. Christer,et al.  Review of delay-time OR modelling of engineering aspects of maintenance , 1994 .

[23]  Ehsan Pourjavad,et al.  Optimum maintenance strategy: a case study in the mining industry , 2012 .

[24]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Human error in maintenance: a review , 2006 .

[25]  María Carmen Carnero Selection of diagnostic techniques and instrumentation in a predictive maintenance program. A case study , 2005 .

[26]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[27]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[28]  B. Vahdani,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 2010 .

[29]  Dirk Vriens Information and Communications Technology for Competitive Intelligence , 2003 .

[30]  Philip A. Scarf,et al.  On the application of mathematical models in maintenance , 1997 .

[31]  Ana Sánchez,et al.  The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety , 1999 .

[32]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  A. H. Christer,et al.  Developments in delay time analysis for modelling plant maintenance , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Mirka Kans,et al.  The advancement of maintenance information technology: A literature review , 2009 .

[35]  Rambabu Kodali,et al.  Analytical hierarchy process for justification of total productive maintenance , 2001 .

[36]  F. C. Gómez de León Hijes,et al.  Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study , 2012 .

[38]  María Del Carmen Carnero Moya,et al.  Model for the Selection of Predictive Maintenance Techniques , 2007, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[39]  Basim Al-Najjar,et al.  Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making , 2003 .

[40]  MaCarmen Carnero An evaluation system of the setting up of predictive maintenance programmes , 2006 .

[41]  Subramaniam Ganesan,et al.  Condition based maintenance: a survey , 2012 .

[42]  John Wang,et al.  Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization , 2018 .

[43]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  An Expanded Assessment of Data Mining Approaches for Analyzing Actuarial Student Success Rate , 2016 .

[44]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  A literature review of maintenance performance measurement: A conceptual framework and directions for future research , 2011 .

[45]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of maintenance strategies , 2006 .

[46]  R. M. Chandima Ratnayake,et al.  Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy , 2010 .

[47]  Maurizio Bevilacqua,et al.  A combined goal programming - AHP approach to maintenance selection problem , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[48]  M. N. Azaiez A multi‐attribute preventive replacement model , 2002 .

[49]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  Practical application of the Decision Making Grid (DMG) , 2011 .