The Case for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Health Services Research

A judicious combination of qualitative and quantitative methods can play a valuable role in health services research. This paper reviews the main reasons for combining methods: for different stages in a project; to compensate for the shortcomings of individual methods; and for the purpose of ‘triangulation’. It examines the potential for qualitative approaches to contribute to quantitative work — by providing insights into the process of data construction, identifying relevant variables to be studied, furnishing explanations for unexpected or anomalous findings, and generating hypotheses or research questions for further investigation. Similarly, qualitative work can be enhanced by using quantitative techniques — albeit often in a modified form — in analysing data, developing sampling strategies, and amalgamating findings from separate qualitative studies. Although there is potential to develop multi-method approaches, there remains an important role for rigorous studies employing either qualitative or quantitative methods.

[1]  S. Porter The poverty of professionalization: a critical analysis of strategies for the occupational advancement of nursing. , 1992, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  Robert Dingwall,et al.  ‘Don’t mind him - he’s from Barcelona’ , 2020 .

[3]  James A. Davis,et al.  Constructing social research , 1994 .

[4]  J. Finch The Vignette Technique in Survey Research , 1987 .

[5]  J. Popay,et al.  Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[6]  A Steckler,et al.  Toward Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: An Introduction , 1992, Health education quarterly.

[7]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[8]  N Britten,et al.  Qualitative research and general practice. , 1993, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  M. Bloor The Sociology of HIV Transmission , 1995 .

[10]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  'Quality' in qualitative research , 1994 .

[12]  H de Vries,et al.  The Utilization of Qualitative and Quantitative Data for Health Education Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation: A Spiral Approach , 1992, Health education quarterly.

[13]  K. Schulz,et al.  Subverting randomization in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[14]  Anton J. Kuzel,et al.  Sampling in qualitative inquiry. , 1992 .

[15]  R. Barbour The impact of working with people with HIV/AIDS: a review of the literature. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[16]  D R Buchanan,et al.  An Uneasy Alliance: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods , 1992, Health education quarterly.

[17]  M. Ross,et al.  Determinants of reported burnout in health professionals associated with the care of patients with AIDS. , 1988, AIDS.

[18]  N Black,et al.  Why we need qualitative research. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[19]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[20]  R. Barbour Mixing Qualitative Methods: Quality Assurance or Qualitative Quagmire? , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[21]  Jo-Ellen Asbury,et al.  Overview of Focus Group Research , 1995 .

[22]  A. Williams The practice of health services research. , 1983, Community medicine.

[23]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act in Sociology. , 1973 .

[24]  N Mays,et al.  Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research , 1995 .

[25]  K McPherson,et al.  The Cochrane Lecture. The best and the enemy of the good: randomised controlled trials, uncertainty, and assessing the role of patient choice in medical decision making. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[26]  A. Bryman Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[27]  M. Gantley The qualitative and the quantitative: An anthropological perspective on research methods , 1994 .

[28]  N. Black,et al.  Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[29]  J. Askham,et al.  The negotiated role of the midwife in Scotland , 1995 .

[30]  Catherine Pope,et al.  Trouble in store: some thoughts on the management of waiting lists , 1991 .

[31]  C. Worth,et al.  Understanding differences between high and low childhood accident rate areas: the importance of qualitative data. , 1994, Journal of Public Health Medicine.

[32]  I. Russell,et al.  Methods of Health Services Evaluation: The Gospel of Archie Cochrane after 25 Years , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[33]  P. Tyrer,et al.  Combining qualitative studies with randomised controlled trials is often useful , 1996, BMJ.

[34]  K O'Brien,et al.  Using Focus Groups to Develop Health Surveys: An Example from Research on Social Relationships and AIDS-Preventive Behavior , 1993, Health education quarterly.

[35]  N. Black Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care , 1996, BMJ.