The ecosystem of expertise: complementary knowledges for sustainable development

Abstract This article critically examines the approach of technical experts, including engineers, natural scientists, architects, planners, and other practitioners, who are attempting to create more sustainable forms of economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. The authors identify four principal characteristics of expertise–ontological assumptions, epistemological approaches, power inequalities, and practical issues–and employ this framework to test the capability of traditional experts to deliver sustainable development. The authors then provide four alternatives to conventional forms of expertise: the outreach expert who communicates effectively to non-experts, the interdisciplinary expert who understands the overlaps of neighboring technical disciplines, the meta-expert who brokers the multiple claims of relevance between different forms of expertise, and the civic expert who engages in democratic discourse with non-experts and experts alike. All of these alternative forms are needed to manage the often-competing demands of sustainable development projects and they can be described collectively as an “ecosystem of expertise.”

[1]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[2]  B. Barber Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[3]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[4]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[5]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[6]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[7]  Populism and the Cult of the Expert , 1992 .

[8]  Richard E. Sclove,et al.  The Nuts and Bolts of Democracy: Democratic Theory and Technological Design , 1992 .

[9]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature, and the Sustainable Landscape , 1993 .

[10]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[11]  B. Wynne,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. , 1994 .

[12]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Understanding of Science , 1995 .

[13]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[14]  A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[15]  Scott D. Campbell,et al.  Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable , 1996 .

[16]  State Engineers as Policymakers: Apolitical Experts in a Federalist System , 1996 .

[17]  J. Dryzek The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[18]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[19]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[20]  The politics of expertise in Congress: The rise and fall of the Office of Technology Assessment; and Communication in Congress: Members, staff, and the search for information , 1997 .

[21]  Blended Rationality and Democracy , 1998 .

[22]  Sustainability - the technocratic challenge: a reply , 1998 .

[23]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[24]  POLICY FORUM: Sustainability: the technocentric challenge , 1998 .

[25]  Amory B. Lovins,et al.  Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution , 1999 .

[26]  D. McDowell Foreword , 1999 .

[27]  James C. Scott Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[28]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The Local Politics of Global Sustainability , 1999 .

[29]  H. Nowotny,et al.  The place of people in our knowledge , 1999, European Review.

[30]  B. Joerges Do Politics Have Artefacts? , 1999 .

[31]  S. Yearley Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study , 2000 .

[32]  F. Fischer Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[33]  S. Turner What is the Problem with Experts? , 2001 .

[34]  L. Menand The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America , 2001 .

[35]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  The third wave of science studies , 2002 .

[36]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[37]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[38]  Jackson Lears,et al.  The Metaphysical Club , 2002 .

[39]  Karin Bckstrand,et al.  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2003, Global Environmental Politics.

[40]  The banks of Frankfurt and the sustainable city , 2003 .

[41]  Introduction : The paradoxes of sustainable architecture , 2004 .

[42]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[43]  P. Healey Creativity and urban governance , 2004 .

[44]  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2004 .

[45]  M. Lane,et al.  Community-based Environmental Planning: Operational Dilemmas, Planning Principles and Possible Remedies , 2005 .

[46]  Julie Beth Zimmerman EPA’s P3 - People, Prosperity, and Planet - Award , 2005 .

[47]  David H. Folz,et al.  Explaining the Performance of Mature Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Programs , 2005 .

[48]  Andrew Jamison,et al.  Hubris and Hybrids: A Cultural History of Technology and Science , 2005 .

[49]  Ralf Brand Synchronizing Science and Technology with Human Behaviour , 2005 .

[50]  Ralf Brand,et al.  Urban infrastructures and sustainable social practices , 2005 .

[51]  Andrew Jamison,et al.  On Nanotechnology and Society , 2005 .