The Ubiquitous Clicker

Over 5 semesters and 10 sections, students in a 300-level research methods course used clickers to respond to knowledge-based and opinion/attitude questions about clicker use, the effectiveness of assignments, self-confidence regarding skills and abilities, and more. Changes during the semester and student answers to questions about pedagogy and the execution of the course were compared to course grades (total points earned). Students perceive clicker use positively, reporting that they attend more, pay better attention, and participate more than they normally would due to clicker use. Other positive indicators do emerge linking the achievement of course goals to student performance. Outcomes are discussed in the context of how scientist–educators are encouraged to study scholarship of teaching and learning-type questions in order to be effective teachers.

[1]  Meghan D. McAuliffe,et al.  Efficacy of Personal Response Systems (“Clickers”) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes , 2008 .

[2]  Samuel D Gosling,et al.  Wired but not WEIRD: The promise of the Internet in reaching more diverse samples , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Rob Foels,et al.  Assessing Effective Teaching of Psychology: A Meta-Analytic Integration of Learning Outcomes , 2008 .

[4]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline. , 2010 .

[5]  Danielle H. Dallaire,et al.  Effective Use of Personal Response “Clicker” Systems in Psychology Courses , 2011 .

[6]  J. Stowell,et al.  Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion , 2007 .

[7]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[8]  Anne M. Cleary,et al.  Using Wireless Response Systems to Replicate Behavioral Research Findings in the Classroom , 2008 .

[9]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  Bernard C. Beins,et al.  Principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[11]  Robert S. Feldman,et al.  Promoting Active Learning Using Individual Response Technology in Large Introductory Psychology Classes , 2007 .

[12]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Using Student Response Systems (“Clickers”) to Combat Conformity and Shyness , 2010 .

[13]  Moses M Langley,et al.  On the use of wireless response systems in experimental psychology: Implications for the behavioral researcher , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[14]  K. Anthis,et al.  Is It the Clicker, or Is It the Question? Untangling the Effects of Student Response System Use , 2011 .

[15]  Marianne Fallon,et al.  High-Tech Versus Low-Tech Instructional Strategies , 2011 .

[16]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Java Applets for Power and Sample Size , 2015 .

[17]  Debra L. Hollister,et al.  Toward a scientist-educator model of teaching psychology. , 2010 .

[18]  Angel Hoekstra.  Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses , 2008 .

[19]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems , 2007 .

[20]  Dennis M. Shaffer,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response System in the Classroom , 2009 .

[21]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .