The effect of a titanium socket with a zirconia abutment on screw loosening after thermocycling in an internally connected implant: a preliminary study

Since esthetic demands of patients increase, it has been accepted to attempt to use zirconia for fabricating prosthetics because of the mechanical properties. However, when choosing abutments for the posterior implant region, zirconia material was not preferred to overcome titanium material. When especially using internally connected zirconia abutments, connection area between the implant and the abutment might be weak to fracture. Because of the weak link between the zirconia abutment and the titanium implant, especially in internal type systems, dentists have been somewhat afraid of using zirconia abutments in the posterior implant region. The introduction of zirconia abutments with a secondary component for internally connected implants was one of major breakthrough endeavors to overcome this weak joint in the zirconia abutment and the implant connections. Such an assembly would be Original Article https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.2.114

[1]  S. Heo,et al.  Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts. , 2015, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  R. Jung,et al.  In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  S. Caputi,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation of Thermomechanic Coupling in Conical Implant-to-Abutment Joint , 2007, Implant dentistry.

[4]  Torsten Jemt,et al.  Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  Horst Fischer,et al.  In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Kenneth G Boberick,et al.  Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. , 2003, The Journal of oral implantology.

[7]  W H Mörmann,et al.  Flexural strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  M. Swain,et al.  Thermal expansion coefficient of titanium casting. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  S E Eckert,et al.  Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  E A Patterson,et al.  Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  Jearl D. Walker Fundamentals of Physics Extended, 9th ed. , 2010 .

[12]  N. D. Adatia,et al.  Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[13]  T D Taylor,et al.  Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  J A Holloway,et al.  Implant screw mechanics. , 1998, Dental clinics of North America.

[15]  R. T. Pascoe,et al.  Ceramic steel? , 1975, Nature.

[16]  D. Halliday,et al.  Fundamentals of Physics Extended , 1960 .