Adaptive through‐thickness integration for accurate springback prediction

Accurate numerical prediction of springback in sheet metal forming is essential for the automotive industry. Numerous factors influence the accuracy of prediction of this complex phenomenon by using the finite element method. One of them is the numerical integration through the thickness of shell elements. It is known that the traditional numerical schemes are very inefficient in elastic-plastic analysis and even for simple problems they require up to 50 integration points for an accurate springback prediction. An adaptive through-thickness integration strategy can be a good alternative. The main characteristic feature of the strategy is that it defines abscissas and weights depending on the integrand's properties and, thus, can adapt itself to improve the accuracy of integration. A concept of an adaptive through-thickness integration strategy for shell elements is presented in this paper. Its potential is demonstrated using two examples. Calculations of a simple test - bending a beam under tension - show that for a similar set of material and process parameters the adaptive rule with seven integration points performs significantly better than the traditional trapezoidal rule with 50 points. Simulations of an unconstrained cylindrical bending problem demonstrate that the adaptive through-thickness integration strategy for shell elements can guarantee an accurate springback prediction at minimal costs

[1]  M. Oliveira,et al.  Study on the Influence of the Work Hardening Models Constitutive Parameters Identification in the Springback Prediction , 2005 .

[2]  Fusahito Yoshida,et al.  A Model of Large-Strain Cyclic Plasticity and its Application to Springback Simulation , 2002 .

[3]  Timo Meinders,et al.  Efficient implicit finite element analysis of sheet forming processes , 2003 .

[4]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Adaptive multi-point quadrature for elastic-plastic shell elements , 1998 .

[5]  A. Pifko,et al.  A finite element method for the plastic bending analysis of structures , 1968 .

[6]  J. Huetink,et al.  Influence of numerical parameters on springback prediction in sheet metal forming , 2006 .

[7]  J. Huetink,et al.  Influence of an Accurate Trimming operation on Springback , 2005 .

[8]  J. Huetink,et al.  A Planar Anisotropic Yield Function Based on Multi Axial Stress States in Finite Elements , 1997 .

[9]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Simulation of springback , 2002 .

[10]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Numerical integration strategy for plates and shells , 1990 .

[11]  K. M. Liew,et al.  Optimal stress sampling points of plane triangular elements for patch recovery of nodal stresses , 2003 .

[12]  Soo-Ik Oh,et al.  A four-node shell element with enhanced bending performance for springback analysis , 2004 .

[13]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Simulation of springback: Through-thickness integration , 2007 .

[14]  John R. Rice,et al.  A Metalgorithm for Adaptive Quadrature , 1975, JACM.

[15]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Inelastic effects on springback in metals , 2002 .

[16]  V. T. Meinders,et al.  A sensitivity analysis on the springback behavior of the Unconstrained Bending Problem , 2005 .

[17]  J. Huetink,et al.  Adaptive through-thickness integration strategy for shell elements , 2007 .

[18]  T. O. Espelid Doubly Adaptive Quadrature Routines Based on Newton–Cotes Rules , 2003 .

[19]  Luc Papeleux,et al.  Finite element simulation of springback in sheet metal forming , 2002 .

[20]  W. Gander,et al.  Adaptive Quadrature—Revisited , 2000 .

[21]  B. D. Carleer,et al.  Finite element analysis of deep drawing , 1997 .