Simulation and optimization of pressure-swing adsorption systems for air separation

Over the past 20 years, PSA processes have gained increasing commercial acceptance as an energy-efficient separation technique. After a startup time, the system reaches cyclic steady state (CSS), at which the conditions in each bed at the start and end of each cycle are identical. Contrary to the traditional successive substitution method, we apply a direct determination approach using a Newton-based method with accurate sensitivities to achieve fast and robust convergence to CSS. Trust region methods and scaling are used to handle ill-conditioning and model nonlinearities. When design specifications are imposed, this approach is easily extended to include design constraints. This eliminates trial-and-error experiments and determines all the operating parameters simultaneously. In addition, we modify a standard flux limiter in order to deal with nondifferentiable terms and ensure computational accuracy and efficiency. Optimal PSA processes are designed by means of state-of-the-art rSQP-based optimization algorithms. The simultaneous tailored approach incorporates detailed adsorption models and specialized solution methods. Here, CSS convergence is achieved only at the optimal solution and the time-consuming CSS convergence loop is eliminated. Applications of several nonisothermal VSA O2 bulk gas separation processes are presented to illustrate all of these approaches.

[1]  Y. C. Chen,et al.  A versatile process simulator for adsorptive separations , 1994 .

[2]  Terje Hertzberg,et al.  Optimization of PSA systems—studies on cyclic steady state convergence , 1997 .

[3]  L. Petzold,et al.  Numerical methods and software for sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic systems , 1986 .

[4]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection , 1991 .

[5]  Shengtai Li,et al.  Design of new Daspk for Sensitivity Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  S. Nilchan,et al.  On the Optimisation of Periodic Adsorption Processes , 1998 .

[7]  Jianming He,et al.  Fast solution-adaptive finite volume method for PSA/VSA cycle simulation; 1 single step simulation , 2000 .

[8]  L. Biegler,et al.  Recent improvements to a multiplier-free reduced Hessian successive quadratic programming algorithm , 1998 .

[9]  Arthur W. Westerberg,et al.  A short note : the optimal design of pressure swing adsorption systems. , 1991 .

[10]  L. Petzold,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations: A comparison of methods on a special problem ✩ , 2000 .

[11]  M. Douglas LeVan,et al.  Periodic states of adsorption cycles. I: Direct determination and stability , 1994 .

[12]  R. LeVeque Numerical methods for conservation laws , 1990 .

[13]  P. Boggs,et al.  Sequential quadratic programming for large-scale nonlinear optimization , 2000 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A note on approximation techniques used for process optimization , 1985 .

[15]  M. Douglas LeVan,et al.  Periodic states of adsorption cycles. III. Convergence acceleration for direct determination , 2001 .

[16]  Arthur W. Westerberg,et al.  Acceleration of cyclic steady state convergence for pressure swing adsorption models , 1992 .

[17]  James A. Ritter,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption: experimental and theoretical study on air purification and vapor recovery , 1991 .

[18]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  The simultaneous solution and sensitivity analysis of systems described by ordinary differential equations , 1988, TOMS.

[19]  Wenjie Zhu,et al.  Parallel sensitivity analysis for DAEs with many parameters , 1999 .