Weber-Fechner behavior in symmetry perception?

The literature contains several allusions to the idea that detection of (mirror) symmetry in the presence of noise follows the Weber-Fechner law. This law usually applies to first-order structures, such as length, weight, or pitch, and it holds that just-noticeable differences in a signal vary in proportion to the strength of the signal. Symmetry, however, is a higher order structure, and this theoretical note starts from the idea that, in noisy symmetry, the regularity-to-noise ratio defines the strength of the signal to be considered. We argue that the detectability of the symmetry follows a psychophysical law that also holds for Glass patterns. This law deviates from the Weber-Fechner law in that it implies that, in the middle range of noise proportions, the sensitivity to variations in the regularity-to-noise ratio is disproportionally higher than in both outer ranges.

[1]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Detection of (anti)symmetry and (anti)repetition: Perceptual mechanisms versus cognitive strategies , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  Holographic goodness is not that bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater and Watson (2004) , 2004 .

[3]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[5]  Zili Liu,et al.  Symmetry impedes symmetry discrimination. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  R. Watt,et al.  Detection of bilateral symmetry using spatial filters. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[8]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  Symmetry and repetition in perspective. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Detection of skewed symmetry. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[10]  M. Tapiovaara Ideal observer and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  P. A. Van Der Helm,et al.  Accessibility: a criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual pattern codes , 1991 .

[12]  E. Yodogawa Symmetropy, an entropy-like measure of visual symmetry , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes , 1994 .

[14]  A. Møller,et al.  Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  R. Menzel,et al.  Symmetry perception in an insect , 1996, Nature.

[17]  B Tversky,et al.  Force of symmetry in form perception. , 1984, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns , 1974 .

[19]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  A better approach to goodness: Reply to Wagemans (1999). , 1999 .

[20]  C. Olivers,et al.  Symmetry and selective attention: A dissociation between effortless perception and serial search , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  S. Palmer The Psychology of Perceptual Organization: A Transformational Approach , 1983 .

[22]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Higher-order structure in regularity detection , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  K Prazdny,et al.  On the Perception of Glass Patterns , 1984, Perception.

[24]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  The role of vertical mirror symmetry in visual shape detection. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[25]  Gert van der Vloed,et al.  Blobs strengthen repetition but weaken symmetry , 2003, Vision Research.

[26]  S. Dakin,et al.  Local and global visual grouping: tuning for spatial frequency and contrast. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[27]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  P. Locher,et al.  Global Detection of Symmetry , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[30]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  The force of symmetry revisited: symmetry-to-noise ratios regulate (a)symmetry effects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[31]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Detection of symmetry in tachistoscopically presented dot patterns: Effects of multiple axes and skewing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  L. Glass,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Humans: Correlations Which Cannot be Perceived , 1976, Perception.

[33]  R. Pérez,et al.  Perception of Random Dot Interference Patterns , 1973, Nature.

[34]  H Pashler,et al.  Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Symmetry versus repetition in cyclopean vision: A microgenetic analysis , 2007, Vision Research.

[36]  S F Chipman,et al.  Complexity and structure in visual patterns. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Vicky G Bruce,et al.  Violations of Symmetry and Repetition in Visual Patterns , 1975 .

[38]  Rating of symmetry as continuum , 1987 .

[39]  B Jenkins,et al.  Component processes in the perception of bilaterally symmetric dot textures , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  G. Kanizsa Seeing and thinking. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[41]  J M Zanker,et al.  Does Motion Perception Follow Weber's Law? , 1995, Perception.

[42]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[43]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[44]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[45]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[46]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  Glass-pattern detection is tuned for stereo-depth , 2005, Vision Research.

[47]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Perception of random-dot symmetry and apparent movement at and near isoluminance , 1987, Vision Research.

[48]  Nick Chater,et al.  Holography does not account for goodness: a critique of van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996). , 2004, Psychological review.

[49]  D. Earle Perception of Glass Pattern Structure with Stereopsis , 1985, Perception.

[50]  L. Glass Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[51]  E Leeuwenberg,et al.  The perception of foreground and background as derived from structural information theory. , 1984, Acta psychologica.

[52]  Matthew J Dry,et al.  Using relational structure to detect symmetry: a Voronoi tessellation based model of symmetry perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[53]  H. Barlow,et al.  Limit to the detection of Glass patterns in the presence of noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[55]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry , 1976 .

[56]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Effects of Dot Pattern Parameters and Constraints on the Relative Salience of Vertical Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Vision Research.

[57]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  The honeybee (Apis mellifera) detects bilateral symmetry and discriminates its axis , 1996 .

[58]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  Scale invariance is driven by stimulus density , 2002, Vision Research.

[59]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[60]  T. Poggio,et al.  Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[61]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[62]  Judgment of degree of symmetry in block patterns , 1987 .

[63]  J. A. Leonard,et al.  Stimulus correlates of visual pattern recognition: a probability approach. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.