Responsible research and innovation (RRI) in quantum technology

We are currently witnessing the emergence of a discourse on responsible research and innovation (RRI) in the field of quantum technology. Working on the assumption that the initial stage of discourse is of particular importance with regard to the ascription of meaning to an emerging field, our point of departure is a small corpus of prominent policy-oriented reports on quantum technology recently published in Europe. With a view to these publications, the article analyses various approaches to RRI and discusses lessons learned in nanotechnology discourse as these may impact on emerging discourse on quantum technology and its stance towards RRI. On the basis of our analyses, we outline a strategy for fostering RRI in this promising field of science and technology. We propose implementing a “strong” RRI approach which entails linking parliamentary or other core policy processes to stakeholder dialogues, decision-supporting public engagement and a wide variety of other public communication activities. At the same time, taking our cue from lessons learned in nanotechnology discourse, we argue that a strong RRI approach to quantum technology should be modest and focused in terms of thematic and societal scope.

[1]  Christopher Coenen Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence , 2009 .

[2]  Kedar S. Ranade,et al.  Quantum technology: from research to application , 2016, Applied Physics B.

[3]  David M. Berube,et al.  Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz , 2005 .

[4]  Christopher Coenen Transhumanism and its Genesis: The Shaping of Human Enhancement Discourse by Visions of the Future , 2014 .

[5]  T. Fleischer,et al.  Focus group discussions inform concern assessment and support scientific policy advice for the risk governance of nanomaterials , 2012 .

[6]  W. Hofmann,et al.  Jürgen Habermas: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung; Bd. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft, Suhrkamp: Frankfurt 1981, 533 + 632 S , 2016 .

[7]  Jonathan P Dowling,et al.  Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Introduction from Quantum Physics to Quantum Technology , 1987 .

[9]  Cécile Liéval « Nouveaux risques », controverse environnementale et démocratie participative: l’exemple de l’opposition grenobloise aux nanotechnologies , 2013 .

[10]  A. Grunwald The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2016 .

[11]  S. Massar,et al.  Quantum information processing and communication Strategic report on current status , visions and goals for research in Europe , 2005 .

[12]  J. Habermas Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns , 1981 .

[13]  Joy Bill,et al.  Why the future doesn’t need us , 2003 .

[14]  A. Lösch Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economization , 2009 .

[15]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Nanotechnologie. Forschung, Entwicklung, Anwendung , 2004 .

[16]  Robert Caverly,et al.  Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society , 2013 .

[17]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement , 2012 .

[18]  K. Eric Drexler,et al.  Engines of Creation , 1986 .

[19]  A. Nordmann Shaping the world atom by atom : eine nanowissenschaftliche WeltBildanalyse , 2003 .

[20]  A. Gleich Prospektive Technikbewertung und Technikgestaltung zur Umsetzung des Vorsorgeprinzips , 2013 .

[21]  B. Barber Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[22]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Converging technologies: Visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation , 2007 .

[23]  A. Grunwald,et al.  Netzöffentlichkeit und digitale Demokratie , 2005 .

[24]  Michael Friedewald,et al.  Open consent, biobanking and data protection law: can open consent be ‘informed’ under the forthcoming data protection regulation? , 2015, Life Sciences, Society and Policy.

[25]  Christopher Coenen The Earth as Our Footstool: Visions of Human Enhancement in 19th and 20th Century Britain , 2015 .

[26]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Visions, Hype, and Expectations: A Place for Responsibility , 2013 .

[27]  Jürgen Habermas Three normative models of democracy , 1996 .

[28]  Chris Peterson,et al.  Unbounding the Future: The Nanotechnology Revolution , 1991 .

[29]  Paul Davies,et al.  Schrodinger's Machines: The Quantum Technology Reshaping Everyday Life , 1997 .

[30]  I. van Hoyweghen,et al.  Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ , 2015, Life sciences, society and policy.