Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the utility of a novel microprocessor-linked Step Watch Activity Monitor (SAM) to quantify ambulatory activity after stroke and to evaluate the validity and reliability of conventional accelerometers to measure free-living physical activity in this population. DESIGN Cross-sectional with repeated measures of 2 separate 48-hour recordings in 17 persons wearing an ankle-mounted SAM and Caltrac, a hip-mounted mechanical accelerometer. SETTING Home and community. PARTICIPANTS Seventeen subjects with chronic hemiparetic gait after stroke. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The SAM derived stride counts per day and Caltrac estimated the daily caloric expenditure of physical activity. RESULTS SAM data revealed that stroke patients had a mean strides per day +/- standard deviation of 3035+/-1944 and demonstrated a broad range of daily activity profiles (400-6472 strides). SAM test-retest reliability was high across separate monitoring periods (r=.96, P<.001). Although Caltrac also revealed a broad range of daily activity calories (346+/-217 kcal/d; range, 83-1222 kcal/d), reliability was poor (r=.044, P=not significant) and Caltrac accounted for only 64% of the ambulatory activity quantified by the SAM. CONCLUSIONS Microprocessor-linked accelerometer monitoring, but not conventional accelerometers, are accurate and highly reliable for quantifying ambulatory activity levels in stroke patients. These findings support the utility of personal status monitoring of ambulatory activity as an outcomes instrument and metric in programs to increase physical activity and cardiovascular health after stroke.

[1]  Barbara E. Ainsworth,et al.  Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  S. Oparil,et al.  Physical activity and cardiovascular health , 1996 .

[3]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  R. Brand,et al.  Accuracy of a custom-designed activity monitor: implications for diabetic foot ulcer healing. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  R. Paffenbarger,et al.  Physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. , 1998, Stroke.

[7]  B. Resnick,et al.  Measurement of Activity in Older Adults: Reliability and Validity of the Step Activity Monitor , 2001, Journal of Nursing Measurement.

[8]  E. Roth,et al.  The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification. , 1998, Stroke.

[9]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Cardiovascular fitness after stroke: Role of muscle mass and gait deficit severity. , 2000, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[11]  P A Wolf,et al.  Residual disability in survivors of stroke--the Framingham study. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D A Boone,et al.  Step activity monitor: long-term, continuous recording of ambulatory function. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  S. Embretson,et al.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 1999, Stroke.

[15]  I. Piña,et al.  Statement on exercise. Benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart association. , 1992, Circulation.

[16]  E. Roth,et al.  The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification: executive summary. , 1998, Circulation.

[17]  G E Caldwell,et al.  Estimates of mechanical work and energy transfers: demonstration of a rigid body power model of the recovery leg in gait. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[19]  J F Nichols,et al.  A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults. , 1992, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[20]  R. Robinson,et al.  The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Screening for Post-Stroke Depression , 1989, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[21]  Gerald V. Smith,et al.  Hemiparetic Gait Parameters in Overground Versus Treadmill Walking , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[22]  P. Duncan,et al.  Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[23]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[24]  D B Matchar,et al.  Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[25]  R R Wing,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of the Caltrac accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[27]  H. Nagaraja,et al.  Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  Corcoran Pj,et al.  Effects of plastic and metal leg braces on speed and energy cost of hemiparetic ambulation. , 1970 .

[29]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[30]  G. Cavagna,et al.  External work in walking. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  P S Freedson,et al.  Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  R. Sacco,et al.  Leisure-time physical activity and ischemic stroke risk: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. , 1998, Stroke.

[33]  W. Orr,et al.  External work of walking in hemiparetic patients. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[34]  J. Webster,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. , 1983, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  A. Gardner,et al.  Assessment of free-living daily physical activity in older claudicants: validation against the doubly labeled water technique. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[36]  K Potempa,et al.  Physiological outcomes of aerobic exercise training in hemiparetic stroke patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[37]  A. Gardner,et al.  Physical activity monitoring in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. , 1997, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[38]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[39]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[40]  P. Williams,et al.  Physical activity and public health. , 1995, JAMA.

[41]  T P Schmalzried,et al.  Step activity monitor: Increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.