Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions?

[1]  D. K. Kagehiro,et al.  Handbook of psychology and law , 1992 .

[2]  S. Breckler,et al.  Management of Complex Civil Litigation , 1992 .

[3]  Samuel R. Gross,et al.  Getting to no: a study of settlement negotiations and the selection of cases for trial. , 1991, Michigan law review.

[4]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  Comprehension's Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of Source Cues , 1991 .

[5]  J. Cecil,et al.  Citizen Comprehension of Difficult Issues: Lessons from Civil Jury Trials , 1991 .

[6]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  E F Loftus,et al.  Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[9]  J. Guinther.  The jury in America , 1988 .

[10]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. , 1987 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[12]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[13]  Bert Pryor,et al.  Attitude Change , 1982 .

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[15]  W. Luneburg,et al.  Specially Qualified Juries and Expert Nonjury Tribunals: Alternatives for Coping with the Complexities of Modern Civil Litigation , 1981 .

[16]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[17]  B. Sales,et al.  In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It , 1977 .

[18]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. , 1974 .

[19]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[20]  E. Aronson,et al.  Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[21]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[22]  J. Frank.  Courts on trial : myth and reality in American justice , 1951 .