Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): role of exposure and impact on categorical perception.

The respective influences of exposure and inborn neural networks on conspecific and nonconspecific face processing remain unclear. Although the importance of exposure in the development of object and face recognition in general is well documented, studies explicitly comparing face recognition across species showed a species-specific effect. For instance, laboratory monkeys exposed daily to human faces were better at discriminating monkeys than humans, suggesting that the role of exposure may not be the only factor affecting cross-species recognition. In the present study, the authors investigated conspecific and nonconspecific face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from 2 primate centers that provided different exposure to chimpanzee and human faces. The authors showed that the chimpanzees from the center providing more exposure to human faces than to chimpanzee faces were better at discriminating human faces than they were at discriminating chimpanzee faces. The chimpanzees from the other center did not show the same effect. A computational simulation was developed to evaluate the average similarities among human pictures and among chimpanzee pictures. Both categories were comparable. Chimpanzees' scores were significantly correlated with the similarity coefficients. Overall, the results show that exposure is a critical determinant in conspecific and nonconspecific face recognition.

[1]  L. Parr,et al.  The Perception of Unfamiliar Faces and Houses by Chimpanzees: Influence of Rotation Angle , 2006, Perception.

[2]  P. Benson,et al.  Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  L. Parr,et al.  Visual kin recognition in chimpanzees , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Elinor McKone,et al.  The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Effects of training on Japanese face recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect , 1985 .

[6]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[7]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Shaun P. Collin,et al.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences , 2000 .

[9]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Plasticity of face processing in infancy. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  G. Berntson,et al.  Cardiac correlates of individual recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1986, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Superiority of conspecific faces and reduced inversion effect in face perception by a chimpanzee. , 1993, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[12]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  W. Hopkins,et al.  Perception of Human Chimeric Faces by Chimpanzees: Evidence for a Right Hemisphere Advantage , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[17]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  K. Fujita Species preference by infant macaques with controlled social experience , 1990, International Journal of Primatology.

[19]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  G. Berntson,et al.  Conspecific recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardiac responses to significant others. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[21]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Tomonaga Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) , 1999, Primates.

[23]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[24]  F. Keil,et al.  Categorical effects in the perception of faces , 1995, Cognition.

[25]  W A Roberts,et al.  Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  L. Parr,et al.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[29]  S. Harnad Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview , 1987 .

[30]  M. Tomonaga How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: Evidence for an inversion effect in face perception , 1994, Primates.

[31]  J. Winslow,et al.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[32]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons , 1999 .

[33]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  S. Harnad Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition , 1990 .

[37]  Keating Cf,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face , 1993 .

[38]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition: From Theory to Applications , 1999 .

[39]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[40]  Anthony A. Wright,et al.  Monkey and Human Face Perception: Inversion Effects for Human Faces But Not for Monkey Faces or Scenes , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Hartmut Neven,et al.  The Bochum/USC Face Recognition System And How it Fared in the FERET Phase III Test , 1998 .

[43]  G. Sackett Monkeys Reared in Isolation with Pictures as Visual Input: Evidence for an Innate Releasing Mechanism , 1966, Science.

[44]  L. Parr,et al.  Why Faces May Be Special: Evidence of the Inversion Effect in Chimpanzees , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Mothers determine sexual preferences , 1998, Nature.

[46]  Sarah V. Stevenage,et al.  Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces , 1998 .

[47]  S. Schonen,et al.  Hemispheric specialization: face recognition in infancy. First come, first served: a scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy , 1989 .

[48]  N. Humphrey Species and Individuals in the Perceptual World of Monkeys , 1974, Perception.

[49]  D. Levin,et al.  Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Differences in onset latency of macaque inferotemporal neural responses to primate and non-primate faces. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[52]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[53]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[54]  Masayuki Tanaka Visual preference by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photos of primates measured by a free choice-order task: implication for influence of social experience , 2003, Primates.

[55]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  J. Winslow,et al.  Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific? , 1999, Animal Cognition.

[57]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[58]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[59]  K. Fujita Species recognition by five macaque monkeys , 1987, Primates.

[60]  C. Bruce,et al.  Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[62]  K. Fujita Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience , 1993, Primates.

[63]  J. Fagot,et al.  Perception of pictorial human faces by baboons: Effects of stimulus orientation on discrimination performance , 2001 .

[64]  E. G. Keating,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face. , 1993, Journal of comparative psychology.