Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change

Abstract This paper extends work in the area of quantitative reasoning related to rate of change by investigating numerical and nonnumerical reasoning about covarying quantities involved in rate of change via tasks involving multiple representations of covarying quantities. The findings suggest that by systematically varying one quantity, an individual could simultaneously attend to variation in the intensity of change in a quantity indicating a relationship between covarying quantities. The results document how a secondary student, prior to formal instruction in calculus, reasoned numerically and nonnumerically about covarying quantities involved in rate of change in a way that was mathematically powerful and yet not ratio-based. I discuss how coordinating covariational and transformational reasoning supports attending to variation in the intensity of change in quantities involved in rate of change.

[1]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  SIMCALC : Accelerating Students’ Engagement With the Mathematics of Change , 2000 .

[2]  Heather Lynn Johnson.  Making Sense of Rate of Change: Secondary Students' Reasoning About Changing Quantities , 2010 .

[3]  Walter M. Stroup,et al.  Learning the Basics with Calculus , 2005 .

[4]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Implementation Research as a Means to Link Systemic Reform and Applied Psychology in Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[5]  J. Edwards.  Genetic Epistemology , 1971 .

[6]  Ricardo Nemirovsky.  On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign , 1994 .

[7]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  The Mathematics of Change and Variation from a Millennial Perspective: New Content, New Context , 2013 .

[8]  G. Goldin.  A Scientific Perspective on Structured, Task-Based Interviews in Mathematics Education Research , 2000 .

[9]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate , 1994 .

[10]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Concept of Variation and Misconceptions in Cartesian Graphing. , 1989 .

[11]  Sudhir Gupta,et al.  Case Studies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[12]  Daniel Chazan,et al.  Beyond Formulas in Mathematics and Teaching: Dynamics of the High School Algebra Classroom , 2000 .

[13]  Joanne Lobato,et al.  Developing Understanding of Ratio and Measure as a Foundation for Slope , 2002 .

[14]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Chapter 25 Integrating a Models and Modeling Perspective With Existing Research and Practice , 2002 .

[15]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures , 1993 .

[16]  Merlyn J. Behr,et al.  Number concepts and operations in the middle grades , 1988 .

[17]  Walter M. Stroup,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Calculus: A Structural Synthesis of Learning Research , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[19]  Martin A. Simon.  Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: The search for a sense of knowing , 1996 .

[20]  Carlos Castillo-Garsow,et al.  Teaching the Verhulst Model: A Teaching Experiment in Covariational Reasoning and Exponential Growth. , 2010 .

[21]  J. Confrey,et al.  Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions , 1995 .

[22]  P. W. Thompson,et al.  RE-THINKING COVARIATION FROM A QUANTITATIVE PERSPECTIVE: SIMULTANEOUS CONTINUOUS VARIATION , 1998 .

[23]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit , 1994 .

[24]  Daniel Siebert,et al.  Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer , 2002 .

[25]  Nicholas Jackiw,et al.  The Geometer’s Sketchpad , 2008 .

[26]  Lynn Arthur Steen,et al.  On the shoulders of giants: new approaches to numeracy , 1990 .

[27]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  IMAGERY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL REASONING , 1996 .

[28]  J. Clement.  Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability , 2000 .

[29]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[30]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education. I , 1994 .

[31]  Karen J. Graham,et al.  Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making in Algebra , 2010 .

[32]  J. Piaget.  Adaptation and Intelligence: Organic Selection and Phenocopy , 1980 .

[33]  David Tall,et al.  Concept Images, Computers, and Curriculum Change , 1989 .

[34]  Susan J. Lamon,et al.  More : in-depth discussion of the reasoning activities in "Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding" , 1999 .

[35]  Tasneem Hameed,et al.  Change. , 2018, The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association.

[36]  Marilyn P. Carlson,et al.  Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study. , 2002 .

[37]  Douglas K. Brumbaugh.  Reasoning and Proof , 2013 .

[38]  Michelle Zandieh,et al.  Exploring the Role of Metonymy in Mathematical Understanding and Reasoning: The Concept of Derivative as an Example. , 2006 .

[39]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  Students, Functions, and the Undergraduate Curriculum † , 1994 .

[40]  Amy B. Ellis,et al.  How "Focusing Phenomena" in the Instructional Environment Support Individual Students' Generalizations , 2003 .

[41]  James J. Kaput,et al.  From static to dynamic mathematics: historical and representational perspectives , 2008 .

[42]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[43]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .