Economics of fertility in high-yielding dairy cows on confined TMR systems.

The objective of this review paper was to summarise the latest findings in dairy cattle reproductive economics with an emphasis on high yielding, confined total mixed ration systems. The economic gain increases as the reproductive efficiency improves. These increments follow the law of diminishing returns, but are still positive even at high reproductive performance. Reproductive improvement results in higher milk productivity and, therefore, higher milk income over feed cost, more calf sales and lower culling and breeding expenses. Most high-yielding herds in the United States use a combination of timed artificial insemination (TAI) and oestrous detection (OD) reproductive programme. The ratio of achievable pregnancies between OD and TAI determines the economic value difference between both and their combinations. Nonetheless, complex interactions between reproductive programme, herd relative milk yield, and type of reproductive programme are reported. For example, higher herd relative milk yield would favour programme relying more on TAI. In addition, improved reproductive efficiency produces extra replacements. The availability of additional replacements could allow more aggressive culling policies (e.g. less services for non-pregnant cows) to balance on-farm supply and demand of replacements. Balancing heifer replacement availability in an efficient reproductive programme brings additional economic benefits. New technologies such as the use of earlier chemical tests for pregnancy diagnosis could be economically effective depending on the goals and characteristics of the farm. Opportunities for individual cow reproductive management within defined reproductive programme exist. These decisions would be based on economic metrics derived from the value of a cow such as the value of a new pregnancy, the cost of a pregnancy loss, or the cost of an extra day open.

[1]  R. Chebel,et al.  Effect of increasing amounts of supplemental progesterone in a timed artificial insemination protocol on fertility of lactating dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss, and response to head stress after AI at 2 different times from ovulation in dairy cows. , 1997 .

[3]  V. Cabrera,et al.  A daily herd Markov-chain model to study the reproductive and economic impact of reproductive programs combining timed artificial insemination and estrus detection. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  V E Cabrera,et al.  An economic decision-making support system for selection of reproductive management programs on dairy farms. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  A De Vries,et al.  Economic comparison of reproductive programs for dairy herds using estrus detection, timed artificial insemination, or a combination. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  V. Cabrera,et al.  The effect of reproductive performance on the dairy cattle herd value assessed by integrating a daily dynamic programming model with a daily Markov chain model. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  R. Chebel,et al.  Effect of inseminating cows in estrus following a presynchronization protocol on reproductive and lactation performances. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  P. Pinedo,et al.  Reproductive risk factors for culling and productive life in large dairy herds in the eastern United States between 2001 and 2006. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  C. Risco,et al.  Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  V. Cabrera,et al.  A simple formulation and solution to the replacement problem: a practical tool to assess the economic cow value, the value of a new pregnancy, and the cost of a pregnancy loss. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  A De Vries,et al.  Economic value of pregnancy in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH , 1995 .

[13]  V. Cabrera,et al.  Economics of resynchronization strategies including chemical tests to identify nonpregnant cows. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Reproductive performance in a select sample of dairy herds. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  K. Weigel,et al.  Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large US commercial farms. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.