The Enactive Torch: A New Tool for the Science of Perception

The cognitive sciences are increasingly coming to terms with the embodied, embedded, extended, and experiential aspects of the mind. Exemplifying this shift, the enactive approach points to an essential role of goal-directed bodily activity in the generation of meaningful perceptual experience, i.e., sense-making. Here, building on recent insights into the transformative effects of practical tool-use, we make use of the enactive approach in order to provide a definition of an enactive interface in terms of augmented sense-making. We introduce such a custom-built interface, the Enactive Torch, and present a study of its experiential effects. The results demonstrate that the user experience is not adequately captured by any standardly assumed perceptual modality; rather, it is a new feeling that is mediated by the design of the device and shaped by the overall situation of the task. Taken together these findings show that there is much to be gained by synergies between engineering and the cognitive sciences in the creation of new experience-centered technology. We suggest that the guiding principle should be the design of interfaces that serve as a transparent medium for augmenting our natural skills of interaction with the world, instead of requiring conscious attention to the interface as an opaque object in the world.

[1]  J. Waller,et al.  Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind , 2009 .

[2]  Marek McGann,et al.  Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction? , 2010 .

[3]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[4]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[5]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science , 2010 .

[8]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Technology as experience , 2004, INTR.

[9]  C. Lenay,et al.  SENSORY SUBSTITUTION: LIMITS AND PERSPECTIVES , 2003 .

[10]  G Guarniero,et al.  Experience of Tactile Vision , 1974, Perception.

[11]  G. Tononi.  Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto , 2008, The Biological Bulletin.

[12]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Mirko Farina.  Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. , 2010 .

[14]  E. Thompson,et al.  Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories , 2009 .

[15]  C. Spence,et al.  The multisensory perception of flavor , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[17]  Charles Spence,et al.  The Perception of Space and Form Recognition in a Simulated Environment: The Case of Minimalist Sensory-Substitution Devices , 2007, Perception.

[18]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Seeing with the Brain , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  A. Clark.  Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[20]  T. Metzinger.  Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference , 2003 .

[21]  Malika Auvray,et al.  Perception With Compensatory Devices: From Sensory Substitution to Sensorimotor Extension , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing ‘Where’ through the Ears: Effects of Learning-by-Doing and Long-Term Sensory Deprivation on Localization Based on Image-to-Sound Substitution , 2008, PloS one.

[23]  Marek McGann,et al.  Enactive theorists do it on purpose: Toward an enactive account of goals and goal-directedness , 2007 .

[24]  M. Rohde,et al.  Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play , 2010 .

[25]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Feel the force: Using tactile technologies to investigate the extended mind , 2008 .

[26]  A. Streri,et al.  Touching for knowing : cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception , 2003 .

[27]  Charles Lenay,et al.  Beyond the internalism/externalism debate: The constitution of the space of perception , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[29]  G. Colombetti.  Enaction, Sense-Making and Emotion , 2013 .

[30]  K. O’regan,et al.  There is something out there: distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[31]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[35]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  E. D. Di Paolo.  Extended Life , 2008 .

[37]  Véronique Havelange,et al.  The Ontological Constitution of Cognition and the Epistemological Constitution of Cognitive Science: Phenomenology, Enaction, and Technology , 2010 .

[38]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. , 1990 .

[39]  J. Stewart.  Foundational Issues in Enaction as a Paradigm for Cognitive Science: From the Origin of Life to Consciousness and Writing , 2010 .

[40]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[41]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society , 2011 .

[42]  J. Prinz.  Putting the Brakes on Enactive Perception , 2006 .

[43]  P. Agre.  Computation and human experience , 1997 .

[44]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[46]  Hideo Mori,et al.  Research and development project for practical use of robotic travel aid for the visually impaired , 2002 .

[47]  Ned Block,et al.  Tactile sensation via spatial perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  Embodied cognition as a motivating perspective for haptic interaction design: A position paper , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[49]  Kevin Warwick.  Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence , 2003 .

[50]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[51]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor, by Richard Coyne , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[52]  Tom Froese,et al.  Validating and Calibrating First- and Second-person Methods in the Science of Consciousness , 2011 .

[53]  Marina Basu.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[54]  Tom Froese,et al.  Toward a Phenomenological Pragmatics of Enactive Perception , 2007 .