Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay.

To examine how people deal with perceivable consequences of their voluntary actions, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a self-paced, two-choice random generation task. Sixteen participants were asked to press one of two buttons randomly at a regular but self-selected interval of once per 1-2 s. Each button press produced either a 1000-Hz or 2000-Hz tone, but participants were told that the tones were irrelevant to the task. The button-tone combinations were initially fixed, but in subsequent blocks, a button press infrequently produced the tone associated with the opposite button (p=.15). This cognitively mismatched tone elicited N2, P3, and late positive potential (or positive slow wave) of the ERP and delayed the timing of the next button press. These results suggest that action effects are difficult to ignore and that an action effect that is different from a performer's expectation may cause task disruption.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-Stimulation Alters Human Sensory Brain Responses , 1973, Science.

[3]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  The effects of temporal and event uncertainty in determining the waveforms of the auditory event related potential (ERP). , 1976, Psychophysiology.

[5]  M. L. Kietzman,et al.  Slow wave and P300 in signal detection. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Daniel S. Ruchkin,et al.  11 Positive Slow Wave and P300: Association and Disassociation , 1983 .

[7]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Daniel S. Ruchkin,et al.  The Late Positive Complex , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Polich,et al.  Bifurcated P300 Peaks: P3a and P3b Revisited? , 1988, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[10]  W. Sommer,et al.  Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[11]  R T Knight,et al.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  L. Garcia-Larrea,et al.  P3, positive slow wave and working memory load: a study on the functional correlates of slow wave activity. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Ullsperger,et al.  Event‐related potentials in a self‐paced novelty oddball task , 2000, Neuroreport.

[14]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Curio,et al.  Speaking modifies voice‐evoked activity in the human auditory cortex , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[16]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control , 2001 .

[17]  E. Schröger,et al.  A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  I. Jentzsch,et al.  Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: topographical analyses and dipole source localization. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Linking Actions and Their Perceivable Consequences in the Human Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Hiroshi Nittono,et al.  Brain Potentials after Clicking a Mouse: A New Psychophysiological Approach to Human-Computer Interaction , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[21]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  H. Nittono The action-perception paradigm: a new perspective in cognitive neuroscience , 2004 .

[23]  Armin Stock,et al.  A short history of ideo-motor action , 2004, Psychological research.

[24]  R. Hari,et al.  Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Ann-Christine Ehlis,et al.  Monitoring of Internal and External Error Signals , 2005 .

[26]  J. Ford,et al.  Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[27]  A. Engel,et al.  What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  H. Nittono Voluntary stimulus production enhances deviance processing in the brain. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  F. Waszak,et al.  Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain , 2007, Brain Research.

[30]  Stefan Berti,et al.  Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[31]  M. Rieger Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[32]  H. Nittono,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited by unexpected visual stimuli after voluntary actions. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  No anticipation–no action: the role of anticipation in action and perception , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[34]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  When goals are missed: Dealing with self-generated and externally induced failure , 2007, NeuroImage.

[35]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Jun'ichi Katayama,et al.  Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[37]  E. Schröger,et al.  Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[38]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: An ERP study , 2008, Neuroscience Research.

[40]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Attention sharing during timing: Modulation by processing demands of an expected stimulus , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Wim Fias,et al.  Post-error slowing: An orienting account , 2009, Cognition.

[43]  E. Schröger,et al.  Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Peter Ullsperger,et al.  Dissociable medial frontal negativities from a common monitoring system for self- and externally caused failure of goal achievement , 2009, NeuroImage.