Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology.

Most Hebrew words are composed of 2 intertwined morphemes: a triconsonantal root and a phonological word pattern. Previous research with conjugated verb forms has shown consistent priming from the verbal patterns, suggesting that verbal forms are automatically parsed by native speakers into their morphemic constituents. The authors investigated the decomposition process, focusing on the structural properties of verbal forms that are perceived and extracted during word recognition. The manipulations consisted of using verbal forms derived from "weak" roots that have one consonant missing in some of the forms. The results demonstrated that if 1 consonant is missing, the parsing system collapses, and there is no evidence for morphological priming. In contrast, when a random consonant is inserted into the weak form, the verbal-pattern priming re-emerges. This outcome suggests that the constraint imposed on the decomposition process is primarily structural and abstract. Moreover, the all-or-none pattern of results is characteristic of rule-based behavior and not of simple correlational systems.

[1]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[2]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[5]  Patricia A. McMullen,et al.  Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia , 1999 .

[6]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[7]  K. Forster,et al.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Richard M. Hogg,et al.  Phonology and Morphology , 1992 .

[9]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.

[12]  L. Feldman Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations , 1994 .

[13]  K. Forster Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. , 1987 .

[14]  Alessandro Laudanna,et al.  PREFIXES AS PROCESSING UNITS , 1994 .

[15]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[16]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[18]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[19]  L. Feldman,et al.  The contribution of morphology to word recognition , 1991, Psychological research.

[20]  G. Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology , 1988 .

[21]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .