Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status.

[1]  Jane M. Young,et al.  CESR technical report 1: the quality and usefulness of the NSW Clinical Cancer Registry Minimum Dataset and Colorectal Dataset Extension for colorectal cancer services research , 2012 .

[2]  H. Putter,et al.  Use of different comorbidity scores for risk-adjustment in the evaluation of quality of colorectal cancer surgery: does it matter? , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  W. Otto,et al.  Predictive capacity of four comorbidity indices estimating perioperative mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder , 2012, BJU international.

[4]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  BioGrid Australia facilitates collaborative medical and bioinformatics research across hospitals and medical research institutes by linking data from diverse disease and data types , 2011, Human mutation.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Worldwide Variations in Colorectal Cancer , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Evidence-Based and Clinical Outcome Scores to Facilitate Audit and Feedback for Colorectal Cancer Care , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Enhancing cancer registry data to promote rational health system design. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  K. Kahn,et al.  Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Quan,et al.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  G. Lyman,et al.  Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  L. Iezzoni,et al.  Using risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical practice: an overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[15]  E. Evans,et al.  Staging of colorectal cancer , 1984 .

[16]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[18]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.