Predicting response before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using new methods for the analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE MRI) data

The pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI have shown promise as biomarkers for tumor response to therapy. However, standard methods of analyzing DCE MRI data (Tofts model) require high temporal resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the Arterial Input Function (AIF). Such models produce reliable biomarkers of response only when a therapy has a large effect on the parameters. We recently reported a method that solves the limitations, the Linear Reference Region Model (LRRM). Similar to other reference region models, the LRRM needs no AIF. Additionally, the LRRM is more accurate and precise than standard methods at low SNR and slow temporal resolution, suggesting LRRM-derived biomarkers could be better predictors. Here, the LRRM, Non-linear Reference Region Model (NRRM), Linear Tofts model (LTM), and Non-linear Tofts Model (NLTM) were used to estimate the RKtrans between muscle and tumor (or the Ktrans for Tofts) and the tumor kep,TOI for 39 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). These parameters and the receptor statuses of each patient were used to construct cross-validated predictive models to classify patients as complete pathological responders (pCR) or non-complete pathological responders (non-pCR) to NAC. Model performance was evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC). The AUC for receptor status alone was 0.62, while the best performance using predictors from the LRRM, NRRM, LTM, and NLTM were AUCs of 0.79, 0.55, 0.60, and 0.59 respectively. This suggests that the LRRM can be used to predict response to NAC in breast cancer.

[1]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  G. Bonney,et al.  Logistic regression for dependent binary observations. , 1987, Biometrics.

[3]  H. Lynch,et al.  Psychologic Aspects of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Research Update for Clinicians , 1997 .

[4]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Prognostic value of pre-treatment DCE-MRI parameters in predicting disease free and overall survival for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  G Brix,et al.  Pharmacokinetic MRI for assessment of malignant glioma response to stereotactic radiotherapy: Initial results , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  D. F. Andrews,et al.  A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression , 1974 .

[9]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Xiangyu Yang,et al.  Improving the pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI by use of the arterial input function: Theory and clinical application , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Henry M Kuerer,et al.  Assessment of histologic features and expression of biomarkers in predicting pathologic response to anthracycline‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[12]  Julio Cárdenas-Rodríguez,et al.  A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Xia Li,et al.  DCE‐MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Pilot study findings , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[16]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology: Theory, Data Acquisition, Analysis, and Examples. , 2007, Current medical imaging reviews.

[17]  N. Hylton Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Arie Ben-David,et al.  About the relationship between ROC curves and Cohen's kappa , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[19]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Angiogenic response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated with parametric histogram from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  B K Rutt,et al.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Wei Wei,et al.  Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Ravinder R Regatte,et al.  Rapid 3D‐T1 mapping of cartilage with variable flip angle and parallel imaging at 3.0T , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Xia Li,et al.  Errors in Quantitative Image Analysis due to Platform-Dependent Image Scaling. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[26]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[27]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  F. Schick,et al.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.