New Control Paradigms for Deregulation

Restructuring of the electric energy utility industry is well underway, even as wide-ranging debate continues about desirable and achievable nature and goals. At this stage of the process, it would be a mistake to assume that any of the experiments in restructuring that are now under way necessarily represent the final patterns that will develop over the next decades. It is important to remember that the traditional industry structural and operating paradigms evolved together, in symbiosis. Energy management in general, and automatic generation control in particular, have been part of that evolution, which has reflected a generally stable pattern of vertically integrated, regulated corporations. The industry’s management and control structures have been effective, in large part because they reflected the existing industry structure. If the industry structure had evolved differently, operating practices no doubt would be quite different. It is to be expected, then, that a radically restructured industry will need, and will develop, new control structures adapted to the new circumstances. One should consider what operating practices, irrespective of past practice, would be most congruent to the new, disaggregated structure?

[1]  Anjan Bose,et al.  On-line power system security analysis. Prolog , 1992 .

[2]  Charles Concordia,et al.  Effect ofPrime-Mover Speed Control Characteristics onElectric Power System Performance , 1969 .

[3]  N. E. Nilsson,et al.  Synchronous generator capability curve testing and evaluation , 1994 .

[4]  H. Kwatny,et al.  Coordination of economic dispatch and load-frequency control in electric power systems , 1979, 1979 18th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[5]  Lester H. Fink Ancillary transmission services , 1996 .

[6]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Transmission access rights and tariffs , 1997 .

[7]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A two-player game model of power cogeneration in New England , 1991 .

[8]  Shih-Yung Tong,et al.  Minimizing Power Transmission Losses by Reactive-Volt-Ampere Control , 1963 .

[9]  H. Happ,et al.  Transmission access issues , 1996 .

[10]  Anjan Bose,et al.  On-line power system security analysis , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  C. Nichols Techniques in Handling Load-Regulating Problems on Interconnected Power Systems [includes discussion] , 1953, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[12]  J. B. Cruz,et al.  Nonclassical control problems and Stackelberg games , 1979 .

[13]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Coordinated multilateral trades for electric power networks: theory and implementation , 1999 .

[14]  Kiyoshi Kumai,et al.  Power System Voltage Control by Using a Process Control Computer , 1968 .

[15]  A. F. Mistr,et al.  Reactive management a key to survival in the 1990s , 1995 .

[16]  L. H. Fink,et al.  Understanding automatic generation control , 1992 .

[17]  M. Innorta,et al.  Evaluation of Economy and/or Security Oriented Objective Functions for Reactive Power Scheduling in Large Scale Systems , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[18]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Stabilizing a multimachine power system via decentralized feedback linearizing excitation control , 1993 .

[19]  Is policy leading analysis in electric restructuring , 1997 .

[20]  Y. Ho,et al.  On the interactions of incentive and information structures , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.