Spectral binning for energy production calculations and multijunction solar cell design

Currently, most solar cells are designed for and evaluated under standard spectra intended to represent typical spectral conditions. However, no single spectrum can capture the spectral variability needed for annual energy production (AEP) calculations, and this shortcoming becomes more significant for series-connected multijunction cells as the number of junctions increases. For this reason, AEP calculations are often performed on very detailed yearlong sets of data, but these pose 2 inherent challenges: (1) These data sets comprise thousands of data points, which appear as a scattered cloud of data when plotted against typical parameters and are hence cumbersome to classify and compare, and (2) large sets of spectra bring with them a corresponding increase in computation or measurement time. Here, we show how a large spectral set can be reduced to just a few “proxy” spectra, which still retain the spectral variability information needed for AEP design and evaluation. The basic “spectral binning” methods should be extensible to a variety of multijunction device architectures. In this study, as a demonstration, the AEP of a 4-junction device is computed for both a full set of spectra and a reduced proxy set, and the results show excellent agreement for as few as 3 proxy spectra. This enables much faster (and thereby more detailed) calculations and indoor measurements and provides a manageable way to parameterize a spectral set, essentially creating a “spectral fingerprint,” which should facilitate the understanding and comparison of different sites.

[1]  M. Green,et al.  Radiative coupling as a means to reduce spectral mismatch in monolithic tandem solar cell stacks theoretical considerations , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[2]  John F. Geisz,et al.  Non-linear luminescent coupling in series-connected multijunction solar cells , 2012 .

[3]  Marta Victoria,et al.  Tuning the current ratio of a CPV system to maximize the energy harvesting in a particular location , 2013 .

[4]  S. Askins,et al.  Spectral study and classification of worldwide locations considering several multijunction solar cell technologies , 2016 .

[5]  S. Askins,et al.  Current‐matching estimation for multijunction cells within a CPV module by means of component cells , 2013 .

[6]  Julio Chaves,et al.  Triple-junction solar cell performance under Fresnel-based concentrators taking into account chromatic aberration and off-axis operation , 2012 .

[7]  S. Kurtz,et al.  The influence of spectral solar irradiance variations on the performance of selected single-junction and multijunction solar cells , 1991 .

[8]  M. Lumb,et al.  Comparing The Energy Yield of (III–V) Multi‐Junction Cells With Different Numbers Of Sub‐Cells , 2010 .

[9]  G. Peharz,et al.  Investigations on the temperature dependence of CPV modules equipped with triple‐junction solar cells , 2011 .

[10]  D. Aiken,et al.  Optimization of inverted metamorphic multijunction solar cells for field-deployed concentrating PV systems , 2009, 2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[11]  Efficient Multijunction Solar Cell Design for Maximum Annual Energy Yield by Representative Spectrum Selection , 2017, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[12]  Carlos Algora,et al.  Handbook of Concentrator Photovoltaic Technology , 2016 .

[13]  K. Araki,et al.  Which is the best number of junctions for solar cells under ever-changing terrestrial spectrum? , 2003, 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of.

[14]  D. C. Law,et al.  Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells , 2011 .

[15]  Ivan Garcia,et al.  Optimization of Multijunction Solar Cells Through Indoor Energy Yield Measurements , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[16]  S. Askins,et al.  Effects of Temperature on Hybrid Lens Performance , 2011 .

[17]  Daniel J. Friedman,et al.  Modelling of tandem cell temperature coefficients , 1996, Conference Record of the Twenty Fifth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1996.

[18]  John F. Geisz,et al.  Analysis of Multijunction Solar Cell Current–Voltage Characteristics in the Presence of Luminescent Coupling , 2013, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[19]  R. Bird,et al.  Simple Solar Spectral Model for Direct and Diffuse Irradiance on Horizontal and Tilted Planes at the Earth's Surface for Cloudless Atmospheres , 1986 .

[20]  A. Dollet,et al.  Assessing the Efficiency of Advanced Multijunction Solar Cells in Real Working Conditions: A Theoretical Analysis , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[21]  K. Emery,et al.  What is the appropriate reference spectrum for characterizing concentrator cells? , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[22]  G. Kinsey Spectrum Sensitivity, Energy Yield, and Revenue Prediction of PV Modules , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[23]  A. Gombert,et al.  Development, cost reduction and customized design of industrial concentrator solar cells with efficiencies approaching 40% and above , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[24]  Ivan Garcia,et al.  Generalized Optoelectronic Model of Series-Connected Multijunction Solar Cells , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[25]  G. Peharz,et al.  Energy harvesting efficiency of III-V triple-junction concentrator solar cells under realistic spectral conditions , 2010 .

[26]  K. Emery,et al.  Temperature dependence of photovoltaic cells, modules and systems , 1996, Conference Record of the Twenty Fifth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1996.

[27]  P. Hebert,et al.  Status of C3MJ+ and C4MJ Production Concentrator Solar Cells at Spectrolab , 2012, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[28]  Ivan Garcia,et al.  Field spectra binning for energy production calculations and multijunction solar cell design , 2015, 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).