Six year follow-up of students who participated in a school-based physical activity intervention: a longitudinal cohort study

BackgroundThe purpose of this paper was to evaluate the long-term impact of a childhood motor skill intervention on adolescent motor skills and physical activity.MethodsIn 2006, we undertook a follow-up of motor skill proficiency (catch, kick, throw, vertical jump, side gallop) and physical activity in adolescents who had participated in a one-year primary school intervention Move It Groove It (MIGI) in 2000. Logistic regression models were analysed for each skill to determine whether the probability of children in the intervention group achieving mastery or near mastery was either maintained or had increased in subsequent years, relative to controls. In these models the main predictor variable was intervention status, with adjustment for gender, grade, and skill level in 2000. A general linear model, controlling for gender and grade, examined whether former intervention students spent more time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at follow-up than control students.ResultsHalf (52%, n = 481) of the 928 MIGI participants were located in 28 schools, with 276 (57%) assessed. 52% were female, 58% in Grade 10, 40% in Grade 11 and 54% were former intervention students. At follow-up, intervention students had improved their catch ability relative to controls and were five times more likely to be able to catch: ORcatch = 5.51, CI (1.95 – 15.55), but had lost their advantage in the throw and kick: ORthrow = .43, CI (.23 – .82), ORkick = .39, CI (.20 – .78). For the other skills, intervention students appeared to maintain their advantage: ORjump = 1.14, CI (.56 – 2.34), ORgallop = 1.24, CI (.55 – 2.79). Intervention students were no more active at follow-up.ConclusionSix years after the 12-month MIGI intervention, whilst intervention students had increased their advantage relative to controls in one skill, and appeared to maintain their advantage in two, they lost their advantage in two skills and were no more active than controls at follow up. More longitudinal research is needed to explore whether gains in motor skill proficiency in children can be sustained and to determine the intervention characteristics that translate to subsequent physical activity.

[1]  G. Welk,et al.  Effects of physical activity interventions in youth. Review and synthesis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  James F Sallis,et al.  Childhood Movement Skills: Predictors of Physical Activity in Anglo American and Mexican American Adolescents? , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[3]  S. Kelder,et al.  Community-wide youth exercise promotion: long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. , 1993, The Journal of school health.

[4]  J. Prochaska,et al.  A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  A. Okely,et al.  Mastery of fundamental movement skills among children in New South Wales: prevalence and sociodemographic distribution. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[6]  John J Reilly,et al.  Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  S. Osganian,et al.  Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. , 1999, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  J F Sallis,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  H. Predel,et al.  Effects of A School-Based Intervention on BMI and Motor Abilities in Childhood. , 2005, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[10]  S. Harter.  Effectance Motivation Reconsidered. Toward a Developmental Model , 1978 .

[11]  R. Christina,et al.  Psychology of motor behavior and sport , 1978 .

[12]  Avigdor Zask,et al.  Interrater Objectivity for Field-Based Fundamental Motor Skill Assessment , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  A. Flintoff.  Targeting Mr average: participation, gender equity and school sport partnerships , 2008 .

[14]  H. Predel,et al.  School-based prevention: Effects on obesity and physical performance after 4 years , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  Risto Telama,et al.  Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  Lennart Raudsepp,et al.  The Relationship Between Fundamental Motor Skills and Outside-School Physical Activity of Elementary School Children , 2006 .

[17]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[18]  David F. Stodden,et al.  A Developmental Perspective on the Role of Motor Skill Competence in Physical Activity: An Emergent Relationship , 2008 .

[19]  C. Corbin.  A textbook of motor development , 1973 .

[20]  Warren O. Eaton,et al.  Gross and fine motor proficiency in preschoolers relationships with free play behavior and activity level , 1989 .

[21]  Michael L. Booth,et al.  Relationships between Body Composition and Fundamental Movement Skills among Children and Adolescents , 2004, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  Adrian Lees,et al.  Effect of a 9-Wk. after-School Multiskills Club on Fundamental Movement Skill Proficiency in 8- to 9-Yr.-Old Children: An Exploratory Trial , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  A. Okely,et al.  Methods of the NSW Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey (SPANS). , 2005, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[24]  A. Okely,et al.  Relationship of physical activity to fundamental movement skills among adolescents. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  A. Bauman,et al.  The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  H. Whiting,et al.  Motor development in children : aspects of coordination and control , 1986 .

[27]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Effects of a Physical Education Program on Children's Manipulative Skills , 1998 .

[28]  L. Barnett,et al.  Active school playgrounds-myth or reality? Results of the "move it groove it" project. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[29]  J. Salmon,et al.  Evidence-based strategies to promote physical activity among children, adolescents and young adults: review and update. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[30]  A. Bauman,et al.  NSW Schools Fitness and Physical Activity Survey , 1997 .

[31]  R M Malina,et al.  Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness across the lifespan. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[32]  A. Bauman,et al.  Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[33]  P. Morgan,et al.  Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  J. Salmon,et al.  Outcomes of a group-randomized trial to prevent excess weight gain, reduce screen behaviours and promote physical activity in 10-year-old children: Switch-Play , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[35]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  Lifelong motor development , 1992 .

[36]  Philip J. Morgan,et al.  The relationship between PE biographies and PE teaching practices of classroom teachers , 2008 .

[37]  Katherine E. Jones,et al.  The Relationship Between Motor Proficiency and Physical Activity in Children , 2006, Pediatrics.

[38]  E van Beurden,et al.  Can we skill and activate children through primary school physical education lessons? "Move it Groove it"--a collaborative health promotion intervention. , 2003, Preventive medicine.