The Development of Autonomous Student Learning Networks: Patterns of Interactions in an Open World Learning Environment for Teachers Exploring Teaching with and through Computer Science

This pilot case study sought to investigate patterns of interactions between learners and their instructor in a teacher education course called “Computer Science for Teachers”. This course was constructed to leverage aspects of open world game design elements in order to investigate the effects of degrees of autonomy in gameplay/learning. This course was conducted in a specially built social learning platform based on Elgg software. Student interactions with the instructor and other students in this course were analyzed to determine the learning networks students constructed during each key learning activity as well as the epistemic spaces defined by these interactions. Descriptive statistics along with social network analysis (SNA) and epistemic network analysis (ENA) were used to investigate these data. The findings indicate that more traditional/less open world gaming type learning activities were associated with learning networks and epistemic spaces that were teacher-centered and narrower, while more open world gaming/high levels of autonomy (student-centric) learning activities were associated with learning networks that were highly decentralized and epistemic spaces that featured students asking and answering questions of/for one another. These findings were consistent with existing research into player behavior in open world type games and learner behavior in settings with high levels of autonomy support. Implications for further research are discussed.

[1]  Marcin Wardaszko,et al.  Mobile Learning Game Effectiveness in Cognitive Learning by Adults: A Comparative Study , 2017 .

[2]  D. Bolliger,et al.  Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. , 2018 .

[3]  Chintan Amrit,et al.  Understanding Information Centrality Metric: A Simulation Approach , 2018, ArXiv.

[4]  John-Arvid Grytnes,et al.  Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: A Self-Determination Theory approach , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[5]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[6]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures , 2015 .

[7]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[8]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[9]  Ahmet Uysal,et al.  Self-Determination Theory in Digital Games , 2016 .

[10]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Why do people play games? A meta-analysis , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  R. Ryan,et al.  Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions , 2020, Motivation and Emotion.

[12]  Tomas Jungert,et al.  A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation , 2014 .

[13]  Benjamin M. Good,et al.  Games with a scientific purpose , 2011, Genome Biology.

[14]  Jing Lv,et al.  Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[16]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  R. Ryan,et al.  Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory , 2021, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  Studying Collaboration Dynamics in Physical Learning Spaces: Considering the Temporal Perspective through Epistemic Network Analysis , 2021, Sensors.

[19]  David I. Schwartz,et al.  Instructional design as game design , 2009, FDG.

[20]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  Analyzing Implicit Social Networks in Multiplayer Online Games , 2014, IEEE Internet Computing.

[21]  Jon Dron,et al.  SEEKING CONNECTIVIST FREEDOM AND INSTRUCTIVIST SAFETY IN A MOOC (EN BUSCA DE LA LIBRE CONECTIVIDAD Y DE LA SEGURIDAD INSTRUCTIVA EN UN MOOC) , 2015 .

[22]  N. Yee,et al.  From Tree House to Barracks , 2006, Games Cult..

[23]  Sylvester Arnab,et al.  Learning Mechanics and Game Mechanics Under the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory to Foster Motivation in Digital Game Based Learning , 2017, 1805.08053.

[24]  B. Lockee,et al.  Gamification in Learning and Education , 2018 .

[25]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[26]  Brendan R. Eagan,et al.  Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[27]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Alessandro De Gloria,et al.  Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  K. Kelly A Yearlong General Education Course Using “Reacting to the Past” Pedagogy to Explore Democratic Practice , 2009 .

[30]  Johanna Pirker,et al.  Analyzing player networks in Destiny , 2018, Entertain. Comput..

[31]  C. Wannheden,et al.  Satisfied or Frustrated? A Qualitative Analysis of Need Satisfying and Need Frustrating Experiences of Engaging With Digital Health Technology in Chronic Care , 2021, Frontiers in Public Health.

[32]  Jing Liu,et al.  Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses , 2016 .

[33]  Cheng-Chieh Hsiao,et al.  The effects of a player's network centrality on resource accessibility, game enjoyment, and continuance intention: A study on online gaming communities , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[34]  Y. Kee,et al.  Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory , 2019, Heliyon.

[35]  W. Peng,et al.  Need Satisfaction Supportive Game Features as Motivational Determinants: An Experimental Study of a Self-Determination Theory Guided Exergame , 2012 .

[36]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Games, Learning, and 21st Century Survival Skills , 2009 .

[37]  Christopher Walsh,et al.  Systems-based literacy practices: Digital games research, gameplay and design , 2010, The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy.

[38]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games , 2006, CHI.

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[40]  Christopher P. Niemiec,et al.  Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom , 2009 .

[41]  A. Morin,et al.  On the motivational nature of authentic leadership practices: a latent profile analysis based on self-determination theory , 2020 .

[42]  K. Sheldon RESEARCH: Catholic Guilt? Comparing Catholics' and Protestants' Religious Motivations , 2006 .

[43]  G. Ferri,et al.  Research Through Game Design. Interactive Stories from a Submerged Amsterdam , 2018, Ocula.