Integrating across neuroimaging modalities boosts prediction accuracy of cognitive ability

Variation in cognitive ability arises from subtle differences in underlying neural architectural properties. Understanding and predicting individual variability in cognition from the differences in brain networks requires harnessing the unique variance captured by different neuroimaging modalities. Here we adopted a multi-level machine learning approach that combines diffusion, functional, and structural MRI data from the Human Connectome Project (N=1050) to provide unitary prediction models of various cognitive abilities: global cognitive function, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, impulsivity, spatial orientation, verbal episodic memory and sustained attention. Out-of-sample predictions of each cognitive score were first generated using a sparsity-constrained principal component regression on individual neuroimaging modalities. These individual predictions were then aggregated and submitted to a LASSO estimator that removed redundant variability across channels. This stacked prediction led to a significant improvement in accuracy, relative to the best single modality predictions (approximately 1% to 4% boost in variance explained), across a majority of the cognitive abilities tested. Further analysis found that diffusion and brain surface properties contribute the most to the predictive power. Our findings establish a lower bound to predict individual differences in cognition using multiple neuroimaging measures of brain architecture, both structural and functional, quantify the relative predictive power of the different imaging modalities, and reveal how each modality provides unique and complementary information about individual differences in cognitive function. Author summary Cognition is a complex and interconnected process whose underlying mechanisms are still unclear. In order to unravel this question, studies usually look at one neuroimaging modality (e.g. functional MRI) and associate the observed brain properties with individual differences in cognitive performance. However, this approach is limiting because it fails to incorporate other sources of brain information and does not generalize well to new data. Here we tackled both problems by using out-of-sample testing and a multi-level learning approach that can efficiently integrate across simultaneous brain measurements. We tested this scenario by evaluating individual differences across several cognitive domains, using five measures that represent morphological, functional and structural aspects of the brain network architecture. We predicted individual cognitive differences using each brain property group separately and then stacked these predictions, forming a new matrix with as many columns as separate brain measurements, that was then fit using a regularized regression model that isolated unique information among modalities and substantially helped enhance prediction accuracy across most of the cognitive domains. This holistic approach provides a framework for capturing non-redundant variability across different imaging modalities, opening a window to easily incorporate more sources of brain information to further understand cognitive function.

[1]  Paola Galdi,et al.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data , 2018 .

[2]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[3]  P. Bonifazi,et al.  Group-Level Progressive Alterations in Brain Connectivity Patterns Revealed by Diffusion-Tensor Brain Networks across Severity Stages in Alzheimer’s Disease , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior , 2019, NeuroImage.

[5]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  Structural brain variation and general intelligence , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  David K. Yu,et al.  Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Finding imaging patterns of structural covariance via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Synergy and Redundancy among Brain Cells of Behaving Monkeys , 1998, NIPS.

[10]  J. Shao Linear Model Selection by Cross-validation , 1993 .

[11]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Structural and diffusion MRI measures of the hippocampus and memory performance , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Synergy in a Neural Code , 2000, Neural Computation.

[13]  James Parker,et al.  on Knowledge and Data Engineering, , 1990 .

[14]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  T. Verstynen,et al.  Affective brain patterns as multivariate neural correlates of cardiovascular disease risk , 2020, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  Peter C. Hansen,et al.  Neural correlates of intelligence as revealed by fMRI of fluid analogies , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016, NeuroImage.

[18]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[19]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Mapping the human brain's cortical-subcortical functional network organization , 2018, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Kahn,et al.  The association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Joelle Zimmermann,et al.  Unique Mapping of Structural and Functional Connectivity on Cognition , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[23]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Exploring Possible Neural Mechanisms of Intelligence Differences Using Processing Speed and Working Memory Tasks: An fMRI Study. , 2009 .

[24]  Fang-Cheng Yeh,et al.  Local connectome phenotypes predict social, health, and cognitive factors , 2017, bioRxiv.

[25]  Alessandro Daducci,et al.  Microstructure Informed Tractography: Pitfalls and Open Challenges , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[26]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  Fluid and flexible minds: Intelligence reflects synchrony in the brain’s intrinsic network architecture , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[27]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies , 2020, bioRxiv.

[28]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Resting-state connectivity and its association with cognitive performance, educational attainment, and household income in UK Biobank (N = 3,950) , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  Timothy D. Verstynen,et al.  Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology , 2018, NeuroImage.

[30]  Gael Varoquaux,et al.  Establishment of Best Practices for Evidence for Prediction: A Review. , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[31]  Fang-Cheng Yeh,et al.  NTU-90: A high angular resolution brain atlas constructed by q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction , 2011, NeuroImage.

[32]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[33]  D. Selkoe Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[34]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns , 2008, NeuroImage.

[35]  Jing Sui,et al.  Neuroimaging-based Individualized Prediction of Cognition and Behavior for Mental Disorders and Health: Methods and Promises , 2020, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior , 2019, NeuroImage.

[38]  Sebastiano Stramaglia,et al.  Structure–function multi‐scale connectomics reveals a major role of the fronto‐striato‐thalamic circuit in brain aging , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Fang-Cheng Yeh,et al.  Connectometry: A statistical approach harnessing the analytical potential of the local connectome , 2016, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[42]  W. Freeman,et al.  Combining fMRI with EEG and MEG in order to relate patterns of brain activity to cognition. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[43]  Arthur W Toga,et al.  Relationships between IQ and regional cortical gray matter thickness in healthy adults. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  TJ Gawne,et al.  How independent are the messages carried by adjacent inferior temporal cortical neurons? , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[45]  Robert H. Paul,et al.  The relationship between frontal gray matter volume and cognition varies across the healthy adult lifespan. , 2006, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[46]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Transmodal Learning of Functional Networks for Alzheimer's Disease Prediction , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[47]  Fang-Cheng Yeh,et al.  Generalized ${ q}$-Sampling Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[51]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  A novel brain partition highlights the modular skeleton shared by structure and function , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging , 2019, NeuroImage.

[53]  R. Cattell Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .

[54]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Changes in thickness and surface area of the human cortex and their relationship with intelligence. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Nancy C. Andreasen,et al.  Intelligence and regional brain volumes in normal controls , 1997 .

[58]  H T Siegelmann,et al.  The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[59]  S. Petersen,et al.  Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures , 2015, Neuron.

[60]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Jun Li,et al.  Brain Anatomical Network and Intelligence , 2009, NeuroImage.

[62]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.