Integrating Multiple Geophysical Datasets

In the past two decades improvements in geophysical instrumentation, survey techniques, and computer methods for handling spatial data have yielded significant advances in the management, portrayal, and interpretation of subsurface data. Geophysical investigations on archaeological sites have long utilized multiple survey methods. The use of difference methods allows responses to a variety of physical properties and the possibility of confirmatory, complementary, or entirely new information from each device. Such datasets have conventionally been examined side-by-side allowing informative comparisons. With GIS and other computer methods data may now be co-registered and more fully integrated in composite graphics of multidimensional content. Several approaches to “data fusion” are investigated including mathematical-statistical techniques, GIS, and advanced computer graphics. High-resolution, large-area datasets from the historic commercial center of Army City (A.D. 1917–1921), in central Kansas, illustrate benefits of these approaches.

[1]  Jay K. Johnson,et al.  Data fusion as a means of sensor evaluation in archaeological applications , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[2]  R. H. White,et al.  Wroxeter hinterland project and geophysical survey at Wroxeter , 2000 .

[3]  T. Avery,et al.  Fundamentals of Remote Sensing and Airphoto Interpretation , 1992 .

[4]  J. Weymouth Geophysical Methods of Archaeological Site Surveying , 1986 .

[5]  Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys , 1992 .

[6]  C. V. D. Sande,et al.  A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[8]  L. Conyers Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology , 2004 .

[9]  W. Neubauer GIS in archaeology—the interface between prospection and excavation , 2004 .

[10]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[11]  S. Piro,et al.  Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection , 2000 .

[12]  Kenneth L. Kvamme,et al.  Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology , 2003, American Antiquity.

[13]  B. Bevan Geophysical Exploration for Archaeology: An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration , 1998 .

[14]  Chris Gaffney,et al.  Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists , 2003 .

[15]  G. D. Summers,et al.  The Kerkenes Dağ Survey: an Interim Report , 1996, Anatolian Studies.

[16]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[17]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[18]  Michael L. Hargrave,et al.  The role of resistivity survey in historic site assessment and management: An example from Fort Riley, Kansas , 2002 .

[19]  J. Leckebusch,et al.  Ground‐penetrating radar: a modern three‐dimensional prospection method , 2003 .

[20]  Wolfgang Neubauer,et al.  Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: an approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data , 2002 .

[21]  Armin Schmidt,et al.  Geophysical Data in Archaeology: A Guide to Good Practice , 2002 .

[22]  A. M. Pollard,et al.  Handbook of archaeological sciences , 2001 .